Tools & Wizards About Us
efamagazine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

efamagazine.com

Environments for Aging | The Future of Senior Living Design

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

765 ms

efamagazine.com screenshot

About Website

Visit efamagazine.com now to see the best up-to-date Efamagazine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efamagazine.com

EFA Magazine features senior living communities with ground-breaking designs, cost-effective plans, and sustainable products designed by the best in the industry.

Visit efamagazine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efamagazine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efamagazine.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,430 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efamagazine.com

77 ms

efamagazine.com

132 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

149 ms

otSDKStub.js

168 ms

emerald-privacy-global.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Efamagazine.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.jsdelivr.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (37%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Efamagazine.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 180.0 kB

  • Original 210.6 kB
  • After minification 199.9 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 888.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Efamagazine needs image optimization as it can save up to 888.9 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 73.7 kB
  • After minification 73.7 kB
  • After compression 71.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efamagazine.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (63%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efamagazine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

efamagazine.com

efamagazine.com

77 ms

efamagazine.com

efamagazine.com

132 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

OtAutoBlock.js

149 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

168 ms

emerald-privacy-global.css

emerald-privacy-global.css

48 ms

emerald-privacy-efamagazine.css

emerald-privacy-efamagazine.css

831 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

59 ms

all.css

all.css

95 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

52 ms

css

css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

60 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

58 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

64 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

68 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

72 ms

main.css

main.css

79 ms

main-media-query.css

main-media-query.css

71 ms

animations.css

animations.css

73 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

80 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

82 ms

popper-1.16.1.min.js

popper-1.16.1.min.js

87 ms

tippy-5.2.1.min.js

tippy-5.2.1.min.js

85 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

67 ms

32d880369c.js

32d880369c.js

95 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

63 ms

emerald-form-privacy.js

emerald-form-privacy.js

43 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

57 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

69 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

80 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

78 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

84 ms

loader.js

loader.js

80 ms

p.js

p.js

41 ms

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

491 ms

ajax-load-more.min.js

ajax-load-more.min.js

83 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

160 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

85 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

90 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

97 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

100 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

96 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

99 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

105 ms

main.js

main.js

163 ms

common.js

common.js

116 ms

main.js

main.js

117 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

121 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

123 ms

018f15d5-edf4-7d6a-9836-97abfb1ff687.json

018f15d5-edf4-7d6a-9836-97abfb1ff687.json

20 ms

location

location

47 ms

logo.png

logo.png

57 ms

interactive-175767900807.png

interactive-175767900807.png

121 ms

interactive-175767900803.png

interactive-175767900803.png

246 ms

interactive-175767900785.png

interactive-175767900785.png

347 ms

Marvella_Interior_Lobby_People-scaled-1.jpg

Marvella_Interior_Lobby_People-scaled-1.jpg

105 ms

laguna-lobby-150x150.jpg

laguna-lobby-150x150.jpg

56 ms

AdobeStock_148964047-150x150.jpeg

AdobeStock_148964047-150x150.jpeg

57 ms

RESIDENTIAL-UNIT-81-150x150.png

RESIDENTIAL-UNIT-81-150x150.png

100 ms

burchslideshow-150x150.png

burchslideshow-150x150.png

57 ms

Hearthstone-2.jpg

Hearthstone-2.jpg

101 ms

bellwood-senior.png

bellwood-senior.png

103 ms

WinnCompanies.png

WinnCompanies.png

102 ms

Marvella_Interior_Lobby_People-scaled-1-150x150.jpg

Marvella_Interior_Lobby_People-scaled-1-150x150.jpg

100 ms

watermark-pearl-lobby-150x150.png

watermark-pearl-lobby-150x150.png

111 ms

Club-room-Chelsea-at-Fairlawn-150x150.png

Club-room-Chelsea-at-Fairlawn-150x150.png

110 ms

natick-1-150x150.png

natick-1-150x150.png

111 ms

Emerald_Logo_Endorsement_KO.png

Emerald_Logo_Endorsement_KO.png

111 ms

EFA_DesignChamps_Logo-2.png

EFA_DesignChamps_Logo-2.png

111 ms

SLDM-2024-logo-horiz_wEFA-copy-3.png

SLDM-2024-logo-horiz_wEFA-copy-3.png

111 ms

EFA_DesignShowcase_logo-copy-2.png

EFA_DesignShowcase_logo-copy-2.png

120 ms

EFA_RemodelRenov_Logo.jpg

EFA_RemodelRenov_Logo.jpg

245 ms

EFA24_DiningCompetition_logo_horiz-copy-2-1.png

EFA24_DiningCompetition_logo_horiz-copy-2-1.png

245 ms

EFA_DesignChamps_Logo-copy-2-1.png

EFA_DesignChamps_Logo-copy-2-1.png

244 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

64 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

186 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

191 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

190 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

190 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

190 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

142 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

141 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

140 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

102 ms

Accessibility Review

efamagazine.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

efamagazine.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

efamagazine.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efamagazine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efamagazine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efamagazine.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efamagazine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: