Tools & Wizards About Us
efarfor.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

efarfor.ru

Фарфор: Гжель, гжельская керамика

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

247 ms

efarfor.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Efarfor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efarfor.ru

Гжельский фарфоровый завод - фарфор, тематическая роспись, исполнение на заказ. Интернет-магазин гжельского фарфора.

Visit efarfor.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Efarfor.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efarfor.ru performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efarfor.ru

196 ms

efarfor.ru

287 ms

jqueryui.css

258 ms

styles.css

266 ms

dropdown.css

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Efarfor.ru, 3% (1 request) were made to Top100-images.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Efarfor.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (14%)

Content Size

7.2 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Efarfor.ru main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 658.2 kB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 5.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efarfor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 28.9 kB

  • Original 233.9 kB
  • After minification 233.9 kB
  • After compression 205.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 313.0 kB

  • Original 443.7 kB
  • After minification 443.5 kB
  • After compression 130.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efarfor.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 313.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

efarfor.ru

efarfor.ru

196 ms

efarfor.ru

efarfor.ru

287 ms

jqueryui.css

jqueryui.css

258 ms

styles.css

styles.css

266 ms

dropdown.css

dropdown.css

268 ms

all.css

all.css

269 ms

styles.css

styles.css

269 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1266 ms

styles.css

styles.css

505 ms

styles.css

styles.css

522 ms

styles.css

styles.css

520 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

513 ms

jquery-ui.custom.min.js

jquery-ui.custom.min.js

516 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

760 ms

jquery.appear-1.1.1.js

jquery.appear-1.1.1.js

765 ms

tinymce.editor.js

tinymce.editor.js

768 ms

core.js

core.js

779 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

772 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

1012 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

1017 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

1021 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

1025 ms

banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif

banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif

371 ms

go.gif

go.gif

260 ms

b.php

b.php

257 ms

efarfor_sochi2014_176x264.jpg

efarfor_sochi2014_176x264.jpg

256 ms

efarfor_licensiat_176x264.jpg

efarfor_licensiat_176x264.jpg

275 ms

podl_26.jpg

podl_26.jpg

271 ms

img-aside01.jpg

img-aside01.jpg

1260 ms

img-aside02.jpg

img-aside02.jpg

517 ms

367.jpg

367.jpg

506 ms

369.jpg

369.jpg

510 ms

img-aside04.jpg

img-aside04.jpg

518 ms

pasha_5.jpg

pasha_5.jpg

526 ms

print.css

print.css

247 ms

Accessibility Review

efarfor.ru accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

efarfor.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

efarfor.ru SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efarfor.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efarfor.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efarfor.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efarfor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: