Tools & Wizards About Us
efdigitalorlas.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

efdigitalorlas.com

suncitygroup太阳新城|点此进入

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

309 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

efdigitalorlas.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Efdigitalorlas content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efdigitalorlas.com

suncitygroup太阳新城有真人美女荷官现场操作,24小时面对面真实体验,包含了街机电子棋牌体育等多方面的游戏内容,优惠惊喜不断。

Visit efdigitalorlas.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efdigitalorlas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 309 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efdigitalorlas.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.625

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efdigitalorlas.com

309 ms

bootstrap.min.css

88 ms

style.css

165 ms

styleorlas.css

167 ms

maps

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Efdigitalorlas.com, 27% (14 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 15% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 582.7 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

611.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Efdigitalorlas.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 817.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 364.3 kB
  • After minification 346.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efdigitalorlas images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 554.9 kB

  • Original 817.4 kB
  • After minification 806.0 kB
  • After compression 262.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 554.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efdigitalorlas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

efdigitalorlas.com

efdigitalorlas.com

309 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

88 ms

style.css

style.css

165 ms

styleorlas.css

styleorlas.css

167 ms

maps

maps

15 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

171 ms

bootstrap-alert.js

bootstrap-alert.js

169 ms

bootstrap-alerts.js

bootstrap-alerts.js

171 ms

bootstrap-modal.js

bootstrap-modal.js

171 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

241 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

254 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

255 ms

embed

embed

581 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

172 ms

fondo.jpg

fondo.jpg

416 ms

logo.png

logo.png

343 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

js

js

80 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

41 ms

common.js

common.js

54 ms

map.js

map.js

54 ms

google4.png

google4.png

14 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

13 ms

util.js

util.js

91 ms

onion.js

onion.js

68 ms

search_impl.js

search_impl.js

84 ms

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

200 ms

stats.js

stats.js

86 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

73 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

72 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

49 ms

kh

kh

119 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

43 ms

controls.js

controls.js

37 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

53 ms

vt

vt

107 ms

vt

vt

127 ms

vt

vt

93 ms

vt

vt

125 ms

vt

vt

95 ms

vt

vt

124 ms

vt

vt

129 ms

css

css

93 ms

entity11.png

entity11.png

55 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

30 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

25 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

22 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

31 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

37 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

36 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

26 ms

Accessibility Review

efdigitalorlas.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

efdigitalorlas.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

efdigitalorlas.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efdigitalorlas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Efdigitalorlas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efdigitalorlas.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efdigitalorlas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: