Tools & Wizards About Us
efengineering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

efengineering.com

Packaging Machines & Cartoners Since 1990 | E.F Engineering

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

374 ms

efengineering.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ef Engineering content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efengineering.com

E.F Engineering manufactures and delivers packaging machines, cartoners, collator machines, accumulator machines, conveyor systems and custom automated machines

Visit efengineering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efengineering.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efengineering.com

1255 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

241 ms

jquery.js

63 ms

js

867 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Efengineering.com, 27% (20 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 19% (14 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) relates to the external source Code.visitor-track.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (66%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

796.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Efengineering.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 988.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 843.4 kB

  • Original 988.6 kB
  • After minification 987.0 kB
  • After compression 145.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 843.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 148.2 kB
  • After minification 146.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ef Engineering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 382.4 kB

  • Original 769.7 kB
  • After minification 769.7 kB
  • After compression 387.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 382.4 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 316.3 kB

  • Original 433.2 kB
  • After minification 432.5 kB
  • After compression 116.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efengineering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 316.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (31%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ef Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

efengineering.com

efengineering.com

1255 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

241 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

63 ms

js

js

867 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

60 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

927 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1001 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1036 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

1145 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1036 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1146 ms

cryptico.js

cryptico.js

31 ms

VisitorTrack2.js

VisitorTrack2.js

5822 ms

new_header.jpg

new_header.jpg

850 ms

carton-1-menu-1.jpg

carton-1-menu-1.jpg

964 ms

DSCN0438-Home-menu.jpg

DSCN0438-Home-menu.jpg

963 ms

Collator-Pic-1-menu.jpg

Collator-Pic-1-menu.jpg

1874 ms

Accumulator-2-menu.jpg

Accumulator-2-menu.jpg

1875 ms

Stick-Pack-Elevator-Conveyor-1-menu.jpg

Stick-Pack-Elevator-Conveyor-1-menu.jpg

2021 ms

Custom-Project-1-menu.jpg

Custom-Project-1-menu.jpg

2020 ms

F-1940-Tray-Former-menu.jpg

F-1940-Tray-Former-menu.jpg

2016 ms

call_now.png

call_now.png

2016 ms

more_details.png

more_details.png

2021 ms

111.jpg

111.jpg

2122 ms

call-us.jpg

call-us.jpg

2022 ms

follow_facebook.png

follow_facebook.png

2023 ms

instagram-icon.png

instagram-icon.png

2122 ms

FQDHkGwZ2EQ

FQDHkGwZ2EQ

1055 ms

aIOYE_6Ci3U

aIOYE_6Ci3U

951 ms

zkmJSgMIGvw

zkmJSgMIGvw

952 ms

XH0yW7X--Us

XH0yW7X--Us

1059 ms

SNSiYzI673Q

SNSiYzI673Q

1860 ms

tQ_eDx_-Srg

tQ_eDx_-Srg

1015 ms

YJU7ENCyb0Q

YJU7ENCyb0Q

2001 ms

bullet_16.png

bullet_16.png

2079 ms

who.js

who.js

1615 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1322 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1601 ms

js

js

126 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

84 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

156 ms

base.js

base.js

249 ms

collect

collect

1170 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

1111 ms

QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js

QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js

641 ms

embed.js

embed.js

119 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

113 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

145 ms

base.js

base.js

582 ms

Create

Create

1230 ms

Create

Create

1226 ms

Create

Create

1220 ms

Create

Create

1242 ms

Create

Create

1237 ms

Create

Create

1399 ms

id

id

173 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

982 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

987 ms

who.ashx

who.ashx

231 ms

embed.js

embed.js

84 ms

Create

Create

588 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

617 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

621 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

506 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

270 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

224 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

258 ms

log_event

log_event

196 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

59 ms

log_event

log_event

50 ms

log_event

log_event

40 ms

log_event

log_event

39 ms

log_event

log_event

33 ms

Accessibility Review

efengineering.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

efengineering.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

efengineering.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efengineering.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ef Engineering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: