Tools & Wizards About Us
effectsizefaq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

effectsizefaq.com

Effect Size FAQs – Research that matters, results that make sense

Page Load Speed

526 ms in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

362 ms

Page Rendered

134 ms

effectsizefaq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Effect Size Faq content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about effectsizefaq.com

FAQs about Effect Size What is an effect size?Can you give me some examples of an effect size?Why does my research methods textbook have no entry for “effect size”?How to report an effect sizeCohen&#0...

Visit effectsizefaq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Effectsizefaq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 496 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

effectsizefaq.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

effectsizefaq.com

30 ms

effectsizefaq.com

20 ms

jetpack-likes.css

71 ms

style.css

74 ms

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Effectsizefaq.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (106 ms) relates to the external source Fonts-api.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

189.7 kB

After Optimization

136.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Effectsizefaq.com main page is 189.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 70.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 52.6 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 68.9 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 37.7 kB
  • After minification 37.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Effect Size Faq images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 606 B

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 55.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Effectsizefaq.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Effect Size Faq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

effectsizefaq.com

effectsizefaq.com

30 ms

effectsizefaq.com

effectsizefaq.com

20 ms

jetpack-likes.css

jetpack-likes.css

71 ms

style.css

style.css

74 ms

72 ms

79 ms

77 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

87 ms

css

css

106 ms

82 ms

global.css

global.css

84 ms

86 ms

85 ms

w.js

w.js

86 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

1 ms

23 ms

mm_logo.jpg

mm_logo.jpg

51 ms

cropped-mm_favicon.jpg

cropped-mm_favicon.jpg

72 ms

g.gif

g.gif

49 ms

remote-login.php

remote-login.php

84 ms

mm-books_sq.jpg

mm-books_sq.jpg

48 ms

g.gif

g.gif

46 ms

g.gif

g.gif

46 ms

font

font

52 ms

99 ms

mm_logo.jpg

mm_logo.jpg

106 ms

mm-books_sq.jpg

mm-books_sq.jpg

102 ms

font

font

2 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

6 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

14 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

effectsizefaq.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

effectsizefaq.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

effectsizefaq.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Effectsizefaq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Effectsizefaq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

effectsizefaq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Effect Size Faq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: