5.6 sec in total
685 ms
4.7 sec
236 ms
Visit efficiency365.com now to see the best up-to-date Efficiency 365 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efficiency365.com
Efficiency 365 - Get more done with less effort. Learn from the Efficiency Guru, Dr Nitin Paranjape. Work Smarter.
Visit efficiency365.comWe analyzed Efficiency365.com page load time and found that the first response time was 685 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
efficiency365.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
19/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
685 ms
1108 ms
223 ms
445 ms
639 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Efficiency365.com, 29% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Efficiency365.com.
Page size can be reduced by 98.3 kB (50%)
195.4 kB
97.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Efficiency365.com main page is 195.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 124.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efficiency 365 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 21 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (86%)
44
6
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efficiency 365. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efficiency365.com
685 ms
efficiency365.com
1108 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
223 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
445 ms
style.min.css
639 ms
theme.min.css
649 ms
header-footer.min.css
655 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
879 ms
post-25919.css
666 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
667 ms
swiper.min.css
856 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
866 ms
global.css
877 ms
post-18943.css
889 ms
post-18847.css
887 ms
post-19206.css
1073 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1088 ms
solid.min.css
1095 ms
brands.min.css
1097 ms
jetpack.css
1114 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1120 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
1288 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
1305 ms
animations.min.css
1313 ms
post-20180.css
1314 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1488 ms
e-202433.js
22 ms
jquery.min.js
1710 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1523 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1550 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1551 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1600 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1782 ms
hooks.min.js
1739 ms
i18n.min.js
1755 ms
frontend.min.js
1762 ms
waypoints.min.js
1766 ms
css
44 ms
core.min.js
1924 ms
frontend.min.js
1752 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1548 ms
lazyload.min.js
1357 ms
MaxOffice-logo-2020-transparent-white-shadowAsset-8@3x.png
1345 ms
naug001626.png
2238 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
31 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUypcBO5Xk.ttf
32 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUbpcBO5Xk.ttf
50 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVspcBO5Xk.ttf
48 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWAosBO5Xk.ttf
48 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
31 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
50 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUyosBO5Xk.ttf
49 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyo8BO5Xk.ttf
52 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
53 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
55 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
857 ms
TwMA-IISS0AM3LpSUnE.ttf
55 ms
eicons.woff
1117 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf
55 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787wsuxJBkqg.ttf
54 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787zAvBJBkqg.ttf
55 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf
57 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1138 ms
naug001137-e1604180398137.png
430 ms
power-bi-nov-2020-thumb-udemy2-small.png
219 ms
efficiency365.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
efficiency365.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
efficiency365.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efficiency365.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efficiency365.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efficiency365.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Efficiency 365. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: