Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

efficientcode.com

John Kurlak: Full-Stack Web Developer and Algorithms Enthusiast

Page Load Speed

573 ms in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

309 ms

Page Rendered

101 ms

efficientcode.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Efficientcode content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efficientcode.com

Personal website of full-stack web developer and algorithms enthusiast, John Kurlak.

Visit efficientcode.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efficientcode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 410 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efficientcode.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.kurlak.com

163 ms

styles.css

10 ms

css

21 ms

css

38 ms

font-awesome.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Efficientcode.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 25% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) relates to the external source Kurlak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 kB (41%)

Content Size

9.4 kB

After Optimization

5.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Efficientcode.com main page is 9.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 945 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 667 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 945 B or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efficientcode images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 998 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efficientcode.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efficientcode. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

efficientcode.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

efficientcode.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

efficientcode.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efficientcode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Efficientcode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Efficientcode. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: