Tools & Wizards About Us
efm.ae screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

efm.ae

Facility Management Service Provider in UAE | Etisalat Facility Management

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

635 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

efm.ae screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Efm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efm.ae

Facility Management Services: Leading facility management service providing company in UAE offers smart, innovative, integrated, and sustainable facility management services to various sectors like ed...

Visit efm.ae

Key Findings

We analyzed Efm.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 635 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efm.ae performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.196

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efm.ae

635 ms

efm.ae

842 ms

css

47 ms

css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Efm.ae, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Efm.ae.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.2 MB (86%)

Content Size

7.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Efm.ae main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 6.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 6.1 MB

  • Original 6.9 MB
  • After minification 6.9 MB
  • After compression 745.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 MB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 75.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 67.9 kB

  • Original 238.6 kB
  • After minification 238.6 kB
  • After compression 170.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.9 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 50.8 kB
  • After minification 50.8 kB
  • After compression 36.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efm.ae needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (31%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

64

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

efm.ae

efm.ae

635 ms

efm.ae

efm.ae

842 ms

css

css

47 ms

css

css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

206 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

625 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

791 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

799 ms

responsive-tabs.min.css

responsive-tabs.min.css

827 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

839 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

841 ms

style.css

style.css

841 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

989 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

36 ms

webp-hero.bundle.js

webp-hero.bundle.js

53 ms

js

js

77 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1407 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1117 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1257 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1119 ms

jquery.responsiveTabs.min.js

jquery.responsiveTabs.min.js

1119 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1232 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1238 ms

js

js

76 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

1249 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1252 ms

script.js

script.js

1402 ms

w3.js

w3.js

1441 ms

logo.png

logo.png

459 ms

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

645 ms

Banner.webp

Banner.webp

644 ms

Image1.webp

Image1.webp

1148 ms

ICON1.png

ICON1.png

568 ms

ICON3.png

ICON3.png

596 ms

ICON2.png

ICON2.png

643 ms

Icon4.png

Icon4.png

762 ms

Icon5.png

Icon5.png

806 ms

Icon6.png

Icon6.png

833 ms

Icon1.png

Icon1.png

837 ms

Icon2.png

Icon2.png

839 ms

project_1.webp

project_1.webp

1214 ms

project_2.webp

project_2.webp

1014 ms

project_3.webp

project_3.webp

1663 ms

project_4.webp

project_4.webp

1453 ms

EFMClients-08.webp

EFMClients-08.webp

1252 ms

EFMClients-09.webp

EFMClients-09.webp

1433 ms

EFMClients-29.webp

EFMClients-29.webp

1547 ms

EFMClients-20.webp

EFMClients-20.webp

1617 ms

EFMClients-21.webp

EFMClients-21.webp

1664 ms

EFMClients-24.webp

EFMClients-24.webp

1833 ms

EFMClients-26.webp

EFMClients-26.webp

1866 ms

EFMClients-12.webp

EFMClients-12.webp

2743 ms

EFMClients-15.webp

EFMClients-15.webp

1960 ms

EFMClients-16.webp

EFMClients-16.webp

2016 ms

EFMClients-17.webp

EFMClients-17.webp

2017 ms

js

js

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

HelveticaNeueLTStd-Md.otf

HelveticaNeueLTStd-Md.otf

1958 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

38 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

38 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

91 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

91 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

92 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

92 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

92 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2422 ms

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

2031 ms

EFMClients-04.webp

EFMClients-04.webp

2410 ms

EFMClients-28.webp

EFMClients-28.webp

2404 ms

EFMClients-05.webp

EFMClients-05.webp

2402 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

30 ms

EFMClients-06.webp

EFMClients-06.webp

2257 ms

EFMClients-30.webp

EFMClients-30.webp

2219 ms

collect

collect

6 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

EFMClients-19.webp

EFMClients-19.webp

2211 ms

EFMClients-25.webp

EFMClients-25.webp

2154 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

14 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

js

js

48 ms

EFMClients-14.webp

EFMClients-14.webp

2087 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

15 ms

EFMClients-02.webp

EFMClients-02.webp

2069 ms

EFMClients-03.webp

EFMClients-03.webp

2081 ms

EFMClients-07.webp

EFMClients-07.webp

2091 ms

EFMClients-13.webp

EFMClients-13.webp

2128 ms

EFMClients-18.webp

EFMClients-18.webp

2075 ms

EFMClients-27.webp

EFMClients-27.webp

2253 ms

EFMClients-11.webp

EFMClients-11.webp

2109 ms

EFMClients-10.webp

EFMClients-10.webp

2113 ms

EFMClients-22.webp

EFMClients-22.webp

2792 ms

EFMClients-23.webp

EFMClients-23.webp

1973 ms

Logo-1.jpg

Logo-1.jpg

1900 ms

Logo-2.jpg

Logo-2.jpg

1936 ms

Logo-5.jpg

Logo-5.jpg

1906 ms

Logo-6.jpg

Logo-6.jpg

1760 ms

Logo-7.jpg

Logo-7.jpg

1791 ms

Logo-8.jpg

Logo-8.jpg

1713 ms

Logo-9.jpg

Logo-9.jpg

1739 ms

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

gate-n-tunnel-services.webp

1702 ms

Banner.webp

Banner.webp

831 ms

Accessibility Review

efm.ae accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

efm.ae best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

efm.ae SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efm.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efm.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efm.ae

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Efm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: