2.9 sec in total
266 ms
2.5 sec
133 ms
Click here to check amazing EFM content for Paraguay. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efm.de
EFM – Wir bieten Ihnen Komplettlösungen zu Zimbra Hosting, individuelle Lösungen / Schulungen / Support / Lizenzberatungen zu Zimbra. Jetzt mehr erfahren!
Visit efm.deWe analyzed Efm.de page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
efm.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
266 ms
989 ms
94 ms
185 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Efm.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) belongs to the original domain Efm.de.
Page size can be reduced by 51.0 kB (12%)
409.0 kB
358.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Efm.de main page is 409.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 240.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efm.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (68%)
56
18
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efm.de
266 ms
www.efm.de
989 ms
language-selector.css
94 ms
reset-min.css
185 ms
chosen.css
281 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.css
287 ms
style.css
283 ms
custom.css
301 ms
nivoslider.css
303 ms
jcarousel.css
304 ms
style.css
375 ms
styles.css
375 ms
fancybox.css
372 ms
jquery.js
515 ms
s3Captcha.js
400 ms
orderform.js
405 ms
s3Captcha.js
469 ms
zimbrademo.js
469 ms
jwplayer.js
561 ms
nivoslider.js
500 ms
jcarousel.js
506 ms
init.js
560 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
570 ms
sitepress.js
598 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.min.js
616 ms
jquery.imgpreload.min.js
612 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
660 ms
slideshow.js
660 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
665 ms
ready.js
706 ms
cufon-yui.js
723 ms
Ubuntu_Condensed_400.font.js
728 ms
jquery.form.js
765 ms
scripts.js
758 ms
bg_head.png
104 ms
logo.png
104 ms
dropdown_arrow.gif
102 ms
de.png
103 ms
subnav_bottom.png
107 ms
head_shadow.png
121 ms
start_1.jpg
463 ms
phones.png
344 ms
sidebar.png
198 ms
boxes_corner.png
203 ms
box_1.jpg
198 ms
box_2.jpg
211 ms
box_3.jpg
296 ms
box_4.jpg
289 ms
adv_1.png
304 ms
adv_2.png
303 ms
sep_v.gif
388 ms
adv_3.png
502 ms
adv_4.png
398 ms
adv_5.png
408 ms
subnav_top.png
342 ms
subnav.png
383 ms
subnav_sep.png
393 ms
dots.png
413 ms
efm.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
efm.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
efm.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efm.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efm.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efm.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: