5.1 sec in total
738 ms
4.1 sec
246 ms
Visit efm.global now to see the best up-to-date EFM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efm.global
Our Freight Forwarding team and a-la-carte menu of event logistics services match every budget and service requirement. Call our team of experts, today!
Visit efm.globalWe analyzed Efm.global page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
efm.global performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value47.3 s
0/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value47.9 s
0/100
10%
738 ms
98 ms
195 ms
267 ms
268 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Efm.global, 2% (2 requests) were made to J.6sc.co and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Efm.global.
Page size can be reduced by 409.2 kB (10%)
4.1 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Efm.global main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 182.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efm.global needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (85%)
84
13
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 63 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.efm.global
738 ms
all.min.css
98 ms
v4-shims.min.css
195 ms
cnss.css
267 ms
front.min.css
268 ms
settings.css
280 ms
fontello.css
286 ms
223b5c84cc8b9fec8e2f5d0d7ee012d1.min.css
582 ms
jquery.min.js
292 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
359 ms
cnss.js
358 ms
front.min.js
379 ms
051f6839-a79b-47f8-a9b5-efac6764eba8.js
81 ms
js
76 ms
css
38 ms
style.min.css
383 ms
rs6.css
387 ms
core.min.js
448 ms
mouse.min.js
448 ms
sortable.min.js
472 ms
rbtools.min.js
688 ms
rs6.min.js
688 ms
esg.min.js
546 ms
cssua.js
538 ms
fusion-animations.js
566 ms
awb-tabs-widget.js
689 ms
awb-vertical-menu-widget.js
689 ms
modernizr.js
689 ms
fusion.js
691 ms
swiper.js
692 ms
bootstrap.transition.js
710 ms
bootstrap.tooltip.js
734 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
734 ms
jquery.easing.js
760 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
808 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
808 ms
jquery.ilightbox.js
809 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
835 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
834 ms
jquery.fade.js
853 ms
imagesLoaded.js
780 ms
fusion-parallax.js
690 ms
fusion-video-general.js
625 ms
fusion-video-bg.js
641 ms
fusion-lightbox.js
632 ms
fusion-tooltip.js
670 ms
fusion-sharing-box.js
688 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
625 ms
fusion-youtube.js
637 ms
vimeoPlayer.js
621 ms
avada-general-footer.js
618 ms
avada-quantity.js
664 ms
avada-crossfade-images.js
628 ms
avada-select.js
629 ms
avada-live-search.js
616 ms
fusion-alert.js
550 ms
awb-off-canvas.js
547 ms
fusion-flexslider.js
584 ms
6si.min.js
55 ms
awb-background-slider.js
487 ms
fusion-button.js
488 ms
fusion-container.js
495 ms
jquery.elasticslider.js
490 ms
avada-elastic-slider.js
493 ms
avada-drop-down.js
555 ms
avada-header.js
579 ms
avada-menu.js
582 ms
bootstrap.scrollspy.js
555 ms
avada-scrollspy.js
538 ms
fusion-responsive-typography.js
546 ms
fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js
535 ms
fusion-general-global.js
552 ms
fusion-video.js
559 ms
fusion-column.js
527 ms
awb-icons.woff
538 ms
efm-50w.png
609 ms
dummy.png
592 ms
image2-sttars_pathfinder0003-copy.jpg
929 ms
Athletics.png
1011 ms
efm-logo-footer.png
580 ms
ezgif-1-7c25903665.gif
1696 ms
touring20231209_165313-1.jpg
752 ms
efm-automotive-grid-1-scaled.jpg
860 ms
bike.jpg
686 ms
EFM-Global-Members-Logos.png
781 ms
efm-100w.png
99 ms
efm.global accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
efm.global best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
efm.global SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efm.global can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efm.global main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efm.global
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EFM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: