Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

efm.global

Home | EFM Event Logistics for Entertainment, Music & Sports

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

738 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

efm.global screenshot

About Website

Visit efm.global now to see the best up-to-date EFM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efm.global

Our Freight Forwarding team and a-la-carte menu of event logistics services match every budget and service requirement. Call our team of experts, today!

Visit efm.global

Key Findings

We analyzed Efm.global page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efm.global performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value47.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.efm.global

738 ms

all.min.css

98 ms

v4-shims.min.css

195 ms

cnss.css

267 ms

front.min.css

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Efm.global, 2% (2 requests) were made to J.6sc.co and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Efm.global.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 409.2 kB (10%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Efm.global main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 134.9 kB

  • Original 160.3 kB
  • After minification 158.9 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 90.9 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 430.4 kB
  • After minification 430.4 kB
  • After compression 429.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 182.2 kB

  • Original 232.6 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efm.global needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (85%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 63 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

efm.global accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

efm.global best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

efm.global SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efm.global can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efm.global main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EFM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: