5.1 sec in total
286 ms
4.4 sec
414 ms
Click here to check amazing EFMA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efma.fr
Univers EFMA - Chambre de Métiers et de l'Artisanat Isère :
Visit efma.frWe analyzed Efma.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
efma.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.636
9/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
286 ms
651 ms
195 ms
285 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Efma.fr, 75% (67 requests) were made to Cma-isere.fr and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cma-isere.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 437.8 kB (21%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Efma.fr main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFMA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (66%)
76
26
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFMA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efma.fr
286 ms
651 ms
cli-style.css
195 ms
events_manager.css
285 ms
mappress.css
289 ms
style.css
196 ms
style.css
194 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
381 ms
tabulous.css
294 ms
style.css
1439 ms
css
27 ms
css
40 ms
css
46 ms
generic-no-float.css
456 ms
default-styles.css
376 ms
jquery.js
707 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
478 ms
cookielawinfo.js
562 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
565 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
640 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
663 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
657 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
753 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
828 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
844 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
849 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.min.js
896 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
938 ms
jquery.ui.button.min.js
1013 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.min.js
1030 ms
events-manager.js
958 ms
events-manager-pro.js
1003 ms
printomat.js
1042 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1119 ms
addthis_widget.js
13 ms
formreset.min.css
861 ms
formsmain.min.css
961 ms
readyclass.min.css
1004 ms
browsers.min.css
1042 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.js
1045 ms
jquery.mmenu.searchfield.min.js
1119 ms
tabulous.fixed-ao.min.js
1054 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
1317 ms
picturefill.min.js
1318 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1317 ms
scripts.min.js
1309 ms
jquery.json-1.3.js
1316 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1352 ms
gfplaceholderaddon.js
1216 ms
LAB.2.0.3.min.js
1332 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
pattern.jpg
208 ms
logo_full-2.svg
208 ms
ico_share_mail_black.svg
123 ms
ico_share_fb_black.svg
123 ms
ico_share_twt_black.svg
206 ms
collect
69 ms
bg_efma.jpg
480 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6GGomRtBD2u8FwSY4jjlmeA.woff
7 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Nog-We9VNve39Jr4Vs_aDc.woff
11 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
11 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
10 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
11 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGHiec-hVyr2k4iOzEQsW1iE.woff
83 ms
miso-bold-webfont.woff
318 ms
miso-light-webfont.woff
377 ms
IDnkRTPGcrSVo50UyYNK73hCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
82 ms
DPPfSFKxRTXvae2bKDzp5D8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
82 ms
eNfH7kLpF1PZWpsetF-hazFoTnl3mJKNVVnPtbVHJow.woff
82 ms
like.php
369 ms
signature_footer.png
266 ms
300lo.json
65 ms
slide_efma_01-417x378.png
1321 ms
auto-417x378.png
955 ms
beaute-417x378.png
1652 ms
restauration-417x378.png
884 ms
vente-417x378.png
1209 ms
vente-320x140.jpg
303 ms
automobile-320x140.jpg
488 ms
titre_pro-320x140.jpg
675 ms
restauration-320x140.jpg
863 ms
beaute-320x140.jpg
1047 ms
alimentation-320x140.jpg
1066 ms
overlay.png
1046 ms
bx_loader.gif
1230 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
7 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
42 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
67 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
62 ms
efma.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
efma.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
efma.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efma.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efma.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efma.fr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFMA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: