2.8 sec in total
141 ms
1 sec
1.6 sec
Visit efmaefm.org now to see the best up-to-date EFMA Efm content for Norway and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efmaefm.org
EFMA
Visit efmaefm.orgWe analyzed Efmaefm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
efmaefm.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value23.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,590 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value42.6 s
0/100
10%
141 ms
63 ms
56 ms
128 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Efmaefm.org, 18% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (317 ms) belongs to the original domain Efmaefm.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (6%)
21.5 MB
20.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Efmaefm.org main page is 21.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.1 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFMA Efm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 82.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efmaefm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (58%)
113
48
The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFMA Efm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
efmaefm.org
141 ms
js
63 ms
css
56 ms
css
128 ms
css
129 ms
css
146 ms
bootstrap.css
192 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
179 ms
style.css
185 ms
parallax-slider.css
189 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
logosample3.png
199 ms
EFMA33rdAnniversarylogo.jpg
182 ms
jquery.cslider.js
24 ms
scroller.js
52 ms
style.css
51 ms
jquery.js
123 ms
wowslider.js
54 ms
script.js
51 ms
style.css
122 ms
jquery.js
130 ms
wowslider.js
121 ms
script.js
121 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.0.4-packed.js
200 ms
jquery-1.8.2.js
205 ms
isotope.js
199 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.js
198 ms
bootstrap.js
200 ms
flexslider.js
203 ms
carousel.js
207 ms
jquery.cslider.js
204 ms
slider.js
205 ms
fancybox.js
205 ms
twitter.js
254 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
252 ms
excanvas.js
255 ms
jquery.flot.min.js
254 ms
jquery.flot.pie.min.js
255 ms
jquery.flot.stack.js
256 ms
jquery.flot.resize.min.js
256 ms
custom.js
256 ms
js
102 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
collect
84 ms
EFMNOV.png
87 ms
Cardiff2.jpg
164 ms
Cardiff1.jpg
192 ms
Cardiff3.jpg
252 ms
Cardiff4.jpg
206 ms
Stambaugh.jpg
105 ms
ProfCong.jpg
203 ms
George.jpg
87 ms
luyao.jpg
86 ms
theo.jpg
86 ms
Lauren.jpg
140 ms
Adrien.jpg
176 ms
WhitedToni.jpg
195 ms
Elroy.jpg
168 ms
theo.jpg
170 ms
EFMA%202021%20keynote%20speaker.jpg
176 ms
CIFER1.jpg
276 ms
ICFAB20241.jpg
276 ms
icons.css
197 ms
social-icons.css
189 ms
fancybox.css
195 ms
font-awesome.css
197 ms
font-awesome-ie7.css
196 ms
SFIC20241.jpg
254 ms
ISFBI1.jpg
263 ms
2024Specialissue1.jpg
254 ms
mfc1.jpg
252 ms
IRMC20241.jpg
317 ms
monash20241.jpg
314 ms
RSFE1.jpg
314 ms
APAD.jpg
313 ms
NYU20241.jpg
314 ms
Jobs160320241.jpg
268 ms
Jobs6031.jpg
267 ms
Jobs31101.jpg
266 ms
ODU21091.jpg
266 ms
logo1.png
266 ms
glyphicons-mini.png
112 ms
arrows.png
100 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
26 ms
SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf
33 ms
likebox.php
196 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
91 ms
Qw3aZQZaHCLgIWa29ZBTjecUDXx9.ttf
12 ms
css
23 ms
arrows.png
26 ms
widgets.js
82 ms
facebook.png
30 ms
youtube.png
29 ms
linkedin.png
30 ms
cLjDreRHLIa.css
28 ms
CQyuJSz1rAa.css
32 ms
vje_GIwFEfY.css
34 ms
Aq3fWRqzWdY.js
38 ms
fK8r0SIEGvt.js
34 ms
teTZ2tZqwkq.js
35 ms
7CmGfGBVS6H.js
63 ms
pkbS1qk0XD9.js
36 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
36 ms
G95XClHFDrT.js
65 ms
jUHPFyzjzqD.js
72 ms
-I0me8tJcSQ.js
70 ms
4Za9TE_Wiy4.js
68 ms
fG8M15IVi1H.js
70 ms
CkL1MBePXJW.js
68 ms
jMnZJ8wclF3.js
68 ms
HzxD9aAXSyD.js
93 ms
qnn7MVQZYOT.js
70 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
199 ms
lukaszholeczek.json
127 ms
301575300_417783047223957_7003386992085875990_n.jpg
54 ms
kCwDvxe1QsQ.js
10 ms
7mzhNKqWkDi.js
11 ms
300072109_417783050557290_6812841235847082447_n.jpg
27 ms
UXtr_j2Fwe-.png
9 ms
efmaefm.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
efmaefm.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
efmaefm.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efmaefm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efmaefm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efmaefm.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFMA Efm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: