5.1 sec in total
243 ms
3.1 sec
1.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Eframe content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eframe.in
film, branding, elearning, VR, animation, VFX, creative agency, artificial intelligence, information technology, virtual reality, digital transformation, app development, ai, artificial intelligence, ...
Visit eframe.inWe analyzed Eframe.in page load time and found that the first response time was 243 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
eframe.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.342
33/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
243 ms
950 ms
48 ms
373 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Eframe.in, 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (956 ms) belongs to the original domain Eframe.in.
Page size can be reduced by 4.7 MB (72%)
6.6 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Eframe.in main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eframe needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 MB or 71% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 258.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 258.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eframe.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 273.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (22%)
98
76
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eframe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eframe.in
243 ms
eframe.in
950 ms
gtm.js
48 ms
bootstrap-5.0.5-alpha.min.css
373 ms
LineIcons.2.0.css
286 ms
animate.css
366 ms
tiny-slider.css
238 ms
main.css
388 ms
fcf.default.css
413 ms
fcf.default-custom.css
380 ms
eframe-logo.png
407 ms
banner_text1.png
506 ms
pdf-icon.png
507 ms
banner_text2.png
507 ms
banner_text3.png
446 ms
banner_text4.png
558 ms
ehs-next.jpg
614 ms
VRSimulator.jpg
881 ms
hul.jpg
493 ms
itc.jpg
558 ms
clp.jpg
557 ms
cocacola.jpg
593 ms
vesuvius.jpg
650 ms
amazon.jpg
650 ms
unilever.jpg
634 ms
alstom.jpg
704 ms
thyssenkrupp.jpg
716 ms
ceat.jpg
717 ms
tcg-lifesciences.jpg
753 ms
himadri.jpg
753 ms
emami.jpg
807 ms
ge.jpg
810 ms
c-dac.jpg
808 ms
ugl.jpg
855 ms
exprience-bengal.jpg
844 ms
ab-mining.jpg
906 ms
nsdc.jpg
906 ms
rkm.jpg
900 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
17 ms
jquery.min.js
956 ms
bootstrap.bundle-5.0.0.alpha-min.js
863 ms
wow.min.js
746 ms
tiny-slider.js
690 ms
main.js
684 ms
html5lightbox.js
827 ms
css
35 ms
css2
52 ms
fcf.en.js
744 ms
fcf.just-validate.min.js
738 ms
fcf.form.js
746 ms
techno-canada.jpg
687 ms
surya-nepal.jpg
688 ms
scarborough-cares.jpg
718 ms
PN_3Rfi-oW3hYwmKDpxS7F_z_Q.woff
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
113 ms
LineIcons.woff
739 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
115 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
114 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff
115 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
116 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
113 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
115 ms
Urban%20Development%20&%20Municipal%20Agency1.jpg
719 ms
Aprava.jpg
670 ms
Tata.jpg
672 ms
Castrol.jpg
684 ms
berger.jpg
662 ms
bottom-img.png
669 ms
icon7.png
671 ms
icon3.png
674 ms
icon8.png
675 ms
icon1.png
641 ms
icon4.png
641 ms
icon6.png
657 ms
icon2.png
649 ms
more_icon.png
665 ms
bottom-img2.png
620 ms
suda.png
709 ms
ceat1.png
637 ms
dooars2.png
702 ms
vesu3.png
758 ms
amazon4.png
716 ms
NT_VR_Thyssenkrupp.png
681 ms
AmazonVR1.png
635 ms
NT_VR_CEAT.png
707 ms
NT_VR_Vesuvius.png
672 ms
VSAT.png
660 ms
ePTW.png
694 ms
VQR.png
667 ms
VORAC.png
665 ms
Boosta1.png
639 ms
MatchNPick2.png
668 ms
Loto3.png
654 ms
RoadSafety4.png
664 ms
Scarborocares.png
669 ms
Scarborocares2.png
645 ms
iframe_api
38 ms
mhfontello.css
646 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
660 ms
www-widgetapi.js
4 ms
HUL.png
637 ms
Vesuvius-R&D.png
666 ms
banner.png
721 ms
banner-mobile.png
740 ms
pattern.jpg
657 ms
bottom-img4.png
657 ms
contact_img.png
650 ms
bottom-img3.png
675 ms
bottom-logo.png
684 ms
eframe.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
eframe.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
eframe.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eframe.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eframe.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eframe.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eframe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: