26.2 sec in total
713 ms
22.3 sec
3.2 sec
Click here to check amazing EGAC content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about egac.co
Visit egac.coWe analyzed Egac.co page load time and found that the first response time was 713 ms and then it took 25.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
egac.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.0 s
0/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.317
37/100
15%
Value29.8 s
0/100
10%
713 ms
203 ms
168 ms
207 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Egac.co, 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Stats.wpadm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 792.8 kB (30%)
2.7 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Egac.co main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EGAC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 542.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 542.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 182.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egac.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 182.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (74%)
62
16
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EGAC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
egac.co
713 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
203 ms
front.css
168 ms
styles.css
207 ms
ppc.min.css
224 ms
wonderpluginsliderengine.css
264 ms
reset.css
276 ms
1008.css
315 ms
typography.css
336 ms
style.css
387 ms
skt-theme-stylesheet.css
405 ms
prettyPhoto.css
436 ms
orbit-1.3.0.css
479 ms
portfolioStyle.css
481 ms
css
158 ms
css
197 ms
tipTip.css
527 ms
elusive-webfont.css
527 ms
elusive-webfont-ie7.css
551 ms
wpgmza_style.css
556 ms
colorbox.min.css
590 ms
jquery.js
665 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
664 ms
wonderpluginsliderskins.js
764 ms
wonderpluginslider.js
785 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
842 ms
custom.js
855 ms
jQuery.BlackAndWhite.js
896 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1126 ms
scripts.js
1127 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1128 ms
jquery.orbit-1.3.0.js
1127 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1156 ms
kwiks.js
1392 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1392 ms
jquery.tipTip.js
1764 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.5.9-min.js
1202 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1381 ms
stickyheader.js
1819 ms
logoNew222.png
1528 ms
loading.gif
825 ms
AIM.jpeg
6027 ms
12405263_10206911775926515_440763146_o.jpg
1555 ms
12140839_754302821383128_1040139833315358224_n.jpg
1510 ms
a.png
1551 ms
EZACO-.png
1505 ms
EZZ-Steel-Co.png
1501 ms
Abu-Qir-Fertilizers-Co.png
1501 ms
ANRPC.png
1545 ms
dab1389005809_212_pic1.jpg
1532 ms
search.png
1533 ms
getimages.php
20226 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
231 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
516 ms
Elusive-Icons.svg
1490 ms
js
262 ms
menu_close.png
93 ms
drop-arrow.png
80 ms
common.js
110 ms
util.js
154 ms
stats.js
108 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
145 ms
rotator-black.png
100 ms
pause-black.png
106 ms
right-arrow-hover.png
107 ms
left-arrow-hover.png
109 ms
egac.co accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
egac.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
egac.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egac.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Egac.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
egac.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EGAC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: