Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

egrc.org

The home page of the Evergreen Golden Retriever Club.

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

egrc.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to egrc.org homepage info - get ready to check Egrc best content right away, or after learning these important things about egrc.org

evergreen golden retriever club represents the Golden Retriever Club of America in the Pacific Northwest.

Visit egrc.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Egrc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

egrc.org performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

egrc.org

1118 ms

egrc.org

1162 ms

site.css

36 ms

css

27 ms

css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Egrc.org, 28% (7 requests) were made to Assets.neo.registeredsite.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Egrc.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 713.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Egrc.org main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 53.7 kB
  • After minification 52.5 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 665.5 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Egrc needs image optimization as it can save up to 665.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 719 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egrc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 719 B or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (24%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egrc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

egrc.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

egrc.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

egrc.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egrc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Egrc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Egrc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: