Tools & Wizards About Us
egresswindowcoverings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

egresswindowcoverings.com

Custom Egress Window Coverings - Egress Covers in Grand Forks, ND

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

651 ms

Page Rendered

681 ms

egresswindowcoverings.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to egresswindowcoverings.com homepage info - get ready to check Egress Window Coverings best content right away, or after learning these important things about egresswindowcoverings.com

Custom Egress Window Coverings specializes in egress covers for homes throughout Grand Forks, ND. We create covers for windows, basements, and more!

Visit egresswindowcoverings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Egresswindowcoverings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

egresswindowcoverings.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

egresswindowcoverings.com

74 ms

egresswindowcoverings.com

91 ms

js

78 ms

css2

31 ms

bootstrap.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Egresswindowcoverings.com, 20% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 127.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

611.8 kB

After Optimization

484.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Egresswindowcoverings.com main page is 611.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 326.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 78.7 kB

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 35.9 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 326.0 kB
  • After minification 324.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Egress Window Coverings images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 98.9 kB
  • After minification 98.9 kB
  • After compression 85.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 97.8 kB
  • After minification 85.6 kB
  • After compression 65.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egresswindowcoverings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (47%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egress Window Coverings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

egresswindowcoverings.com

egresswindowcoverings.com

74 ms

egresswindowcoverings.com

egresswindowcoverings.com

91 ms

js

js

78 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

22 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

54 ms

default-theme.css

default-theme.css

57 ms

js

js

300 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

69 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

66 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

55 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

57 ms

owl.js

owl.js

63 ms

wow.js

wow.js

62 ms

nav-tool.js

nav-tool.js

66 ms

script.js

script.js

95 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

57 ms

animate.css

animate.css

58 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

62 ms

owl.css

owl.css

62 ms

animation.css

animation.css

63 ms

custom-animate.css

custom-animate.css

65 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

66 ms

embed

embed

331 ms

1i7ikkf6f

1i7ikkf6f

334 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

161 ms

logo.png

logo.png

162 ms

num_captcha.php

num_captcha.php

161 ms

pattern-1.webp

pattern-1.webp

161 ms

about-1.jpg

about-1.jpg

161 ms

product-2.webp

product-2.webp

214 ms

product-1.webp

product-1.webp

193 ms

1.webp

1.webp

245 ms

2.webp

2.webp

215 ms

3.webp

3.webp

245 ms

4.webp

4.webp

243 ms

5.webp

5.webp

245 ms

6.webp

6.webp

246 ms

pattern-6.png

pattern-6.png

245 ms

testimonials.webp

testimonials.webp

273 ms

home-contact.jpg

home-contact.jpg

274 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

274 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

273 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

274 ms

news-5.webp

news-5.webp

273 ms

ada_site.png

ada_site.png

274 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

199 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

211 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

211 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

212 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

210 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

53 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

54 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

81 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

82 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

82 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

82 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

83 ms

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

114 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

136 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

115 ms

js

js

29 ms

Accessibility Review

egresswindowcoverings.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

egresswindowcoverings.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

egresswindowcoverings.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egresswindowcoverings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Egresswindowcoverings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

egresswindowcoverings.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Egress Window Coverings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: