2 sec in total
68 ms
1.5 sec
390 ms
Visit eivf.net now to see the best up-to-date EIVF content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eivf.net
eIVF offers the most evolved capabilities in the market – all under one unified platform. Our EMR solution offers fertility clinics an easier, more efficient of managing their practice.
Visit eivf.netWe analyzed Eivf.net page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
eivf.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value2,120 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
68 ms
242 ms
98 ms
55 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eivf.net, 72% (66 requests) were made to Eivf.org and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (638 ms) relates to the external source Eivf.wpengine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.0 kB (9%)
4.1 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Eivf.net main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 156.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EIVF images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eivf.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (89%)
83
9
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EIVF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eivf.net
68 ms
eivf.org
242 ms
js
98 ms
style-blocks.build.css
55 ms
style-blocks.css
53 ms
ihover.css
46 ms
style.css
59 ms
all.css
60 ms
font-awesome.css
56 ms
owl.theme.default.css
80 ms
isotope-style.css
82 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
78 ms
all.min.css
86 ms
Defaults.css
81 ms
all.css
65 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
129 ms
frontend.min.css
132 ms
swiper.min.css
139 ms
post-9.css
131 ms
frontend.min.css
143 ms
global.css
140 ms
js_composer.min.css
173 ms
css
129 ms
main.min.css
161 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
154 ms
wpbakery.min.css
158 ms
post-type.min.css
156 ms
css-vars.css
188 ms
custom.css
194 ms
media.css
188 ms
mega-menu.css
191 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
255 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
203 ms
style.css
255 ms
elementor-global.min.css
261 ms
style.min.css
255 ms
headings.min.css
256 ms
animate.min.css
256 ms
stats-counter.min.css
258 ms
v4-shims.css
66 ms
css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
258 ms
js
136 ms
js
125 ms
css
74 ms
20835483.js
179 ms
background-style.min.css
255 ms
rs6.css
247 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
242 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
242 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
244 ms
jquery.isotope.js
315 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
235 ms
jquery.gridder.js
224 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
223 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
220 ms
headings.min.js
219 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
213 ms
countUp.min.js
173 ms
custom.min.js
172 ms
main.min.js
167 ms
rbtools.min.js
164 ms
rs6.min.js
165 ms
dismiss.js
149 ms
legacy.min.js
147 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
146 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
136 ms
post-type.min.js
122 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
121 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
116 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
190 ms
js
182 ms
js
181 ms
Untitled-design-14.png
153 ms
the7-chevron-side.svg
155 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
151 ms
dummy.png
153 ms
Untitled-design-15.png
154 ms
Website-Background-5.png
638 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
146 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
146 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
204 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
205 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
145 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
35 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
123 ms
collect
82 ms
banner.js
173 ms
20835483.js
188 ms
collectedforms.js
174 ms
fb.js
162 ms
eivf.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eivf.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eivf.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eivf.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eivf.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eivf.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EIVF. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: