Tools & Wizards About Us
ejc2011.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ejc2011.org

ファクタリングの売掛金を売却で早期資金化の資金調達【カリイク】2024年6月15日更新

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

420 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

ejc2011.org screenshot

About Website

Visit ejc2011.org now to see the best up-to-date Ejc 2011 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ejc2011.org

※_y_年_m_月_d_日更新【ファクタリングとは】普及が進む新しい金融サービス新たな資金調達手段として注目度が高まっているファクタリングは、売掛債権を換金可能な一連の金融サービスです。英語の「factor」には要因や要素といった意味に加え

Visit ejc2011.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ejc2011.org page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ejc2011.org performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.208

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ejc2011.org

420 ms

www.ejc2011.de

764 ms

ga.js

24 ms

adsbygoogle.js

21 ms

ejc-logo2de.jpg

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ejc2011.org, 63% (27 requests) were made to Ejc2011.de and 12% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Ejc2011.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

436.4 kB

After Optimization

368.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ejc2011.org main page is 436.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 337.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 76 B

  • Original 270 B
  • After minification 269 B
  • After compression 194 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76 B or 28% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 337.6 kB
  • After minification 279.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ejc 2011 needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 98.5 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 88.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ejc 2011. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ejc2011.org

ejc2011.org

420 ms

www.ejc2011.de

www.ejc2011.de

764 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

21 ms

ejc-logo2de.jpg

ejc-logo2de.jpg

206 ms

kopf-neu1.jpg

kopf-neu1.jpg

397 ms

de.gif

de.gif

210 ms

en.gif

en.gif

201 ms

fr.gif

fr.gif

1980 ms

es.gif

es.gif

979 ms

it.gif

it.gif

306 ms

pl.gif

pl.gif

307 ms

nl.gif

nl.gif

311 ms

lt.gif

lt.gif

416 ms

sk.gif

sk.gif

417 ms

cs.gif

cs.gif

423 ms

hu.gif

hu.gif

530 ms

ru.gif

ru.gif

530 ms

fi.gif

fi.gif

529 ms

deaf.png

deaf.png

530 ms

kopf-neu2.jpg

kopf-neu2.jpg

607 ms

wolken-subnavi.jpg

wolken-subnavi.jpg

708 ms

540.jpg

540.jpg

915 ms

396.jpg

396.jpg

724 ms

ejc-logo.jpg

ejc-logo.jpg

719 ms

ejc2011_facebook.jpg

ejc2011_facebook.jpg

812 ms

twitter_follow.jpg

twitter_follow.jpg

823 ms

jimev-logo.jpg

jimev-logo.jpg

827 ms

eja-logo.gif

eja-logo.gif

915 ms

munich-logo.gif

munich-logo.gif

928 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

ca-pub-9254756111419810.js

ca-pub-9254756111419810.js

510 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

45 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

61 ms

ads

ads

251 ms

osd.js

osd.js

12 ms

3169748442357717800

3169748442357717800

31 ms

abg.js

abg.js

35 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

46 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

76 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

29 ms

s

s

28 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

ejc2011.org accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ejc2011.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ejc2011.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ejc2011.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ejc2011.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ejc2011.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ejc 2011. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: