Tools & Wizards About Us
elecompack.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

elecompack.org

ELECOMPACK Systems Inc. - Colour Coded File Systems

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

479 ms

elecompack.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to elecompack.org homepage info - get ready to check ELECOMPACK best content right away, or after learning these important things about elecompack.org

Choose Elecompack Systems for all your Canadian medical office supply needs. We sell filing systems, toner ink, and medical exam paper.

Visit elecompack.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Elecompack.org page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elecompack.org performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elecompack.org

113 ms

elecompack.org

1587 ms

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

font-awesome.css

49 ms

css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Elecompack.org, 9% (4 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Elecompack.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 445.1 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elecompack.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 69.7 kB
  • After minification 65.3 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 365.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 974.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ELECOMPACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 365.1 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 279.9 kB
  • After minification 279.9 kB
  • After compression 249.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 13.6 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elecompack.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (23%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ELECOMPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elecompack.org

elecompack.org

113 ms

elecompack.org

elecompack.org

1587 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

49 ms

css

css

44 ms

style.css

style.css

156 ms

api.js

api.js

52 ms

js

js

74 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

15 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

229 ms

ga.js

ga.js

263 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

310 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

267 ms

elecompack_logo.png

elecompack_logo.png

193 ms

DYMO_LABELS_BUTTON_3-page-001.jpg

DYMO_LABELS_BUTTON_3-page-001.jpg

333 ms

ZEBRA_LABELS_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

ZEBRA_LABELS_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

299 ms

BROTHER_LABELS_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

BROTHER_LABELS_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

447 ms

FILE_SUPPLIES_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

FILE_SUPPLIES_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

447 ms

LABEL_PRINTER_BUTTON-page-001.jpg

LABEL_PRINTER_BUTTON-page-001.jpg

396 ms

TRODAT_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

TRODAT_BUTTON_2-page-001_1.jpg

396 ms

COPY_PAPER_BUTTON_11172021-page-001_2.jpg

COPY_PAPER_BUTTON_11172021-page-001_2.jpg

352 ms

EXAM_ROOM_BUTTON_2-page-001.jpg

EXAM_ROOM_BUTTON_2-page-001.jpg

386 ms

OFFICE_PRO_BUTTON_17112021-page-001.jpg

OFFICE_PRO_BUTTON_17112021-page-001.jpg

406 ms

TONER_BUTTON_-_17112021-page-001.jpg

TONER_BUTTON_-_17112021-page-001.jpg

441 ms

YEAR_LABELS_LINK_BUTTON-page-001_1.jpg

YEAR_LABELS_LINK_BUTTON-page-001_1.jpg

453 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

453 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

495 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

643 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

668 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

643 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

669 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

703 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

719 ms

image.ashx

image.ashx

781 ms

BROWS.PNG

BROWS.PNG

798 ms

fig4.PNG

fig4.PNG

953 ms

fig2.PNG

fig2.PNG

982 ms

FIG1.PNG

FIG1.PNG

1025 ms

FIG3.PNG

FIG3.PNG

932 ms

font

font

189 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

147 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

42 ms

Accessibility Review

elecompack.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

elecompack.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

elecompack.org SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elecompack.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elecompack.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elecompack.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ELECOMPACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: