Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

electromenager-compare.com

Comparer les lave-linges, lave-vaiselles, réfrigérateurs, aspirateurs, etc. | electromenager-compare.com

Page Load Speed

496 ms in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

227 ms

Page Rendered

64 ms

electromenager-compare.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to electromenager-compare.com homepage info - get ready to check Electromenager Compare best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about electromenager-compare.com

Electromenager COMPARE : Electromenager, lave-linge, sèche-linge, lave-vaisselle, tables de cuisson, réfrigérateurs, congélateurs, fours, cuisinières, piano de cuisson, aspirateurs : comparateur de pr...

Visit electromenager-compare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Electromenager-compare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 291 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Electromenager-compare.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

electromenager-compare.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

electromenager-compare.com

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Electromenager-compare.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (205 ms) belongs to the original domain Electromenager-compare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

389.0 kB

After Optimization

205.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Electromenager-compare.com main page is 389.0 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 61 B

  • Original 254 B
  • After minification 254 B
  • After compression 193 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61 B or 24% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electromenager Compare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 151.4 kB

  • Original 244.4 kB
  • After minification 244.3 kB
  • After compression 93.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electromenager-compare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

SEO Factors

electromenager-compare.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electromenager-compare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Electromenager-compare.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Electromenager Compare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: