Tools & Wizards About Us
electronicpestrepeller.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

electronicpestrepeller.com

Pest Control – Good Life Inc

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

198 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

398 ms

electronicpestrepeller.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to electronicpestrepeller.com homepage info - get ready to check Electronic Pest Repeller best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about electronicpestrepeller.com

Protect your home and property from pests like mice, rats, rodents, and birds. Pest control that's 100% safe, humane, and eco-friendly.

Visit electronicpestrepeller.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Electronicpestrepeller.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

electronicpestrepeller.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

electronicpestrepeller.com

198 ms

pestrepellerultimate.com

179 ms

504 ms

bootstrap.min.css

105 ms

style.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Electronicpestrepeller.com, 78% (39 requests) were made to Goodlifeinc.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Snap.licdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (603 ms) relates to the external source Goodlifeinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 940.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Electronicpestrepeller.com main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 99.5 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 119.1 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 716.1 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Electronic Pest Repeller needs image optimization as it can save up to 716.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 52.6 kB

  • Original 527.9 kB
  • After minification 527.9 kB
  • After compression 475.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 234.9 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 162.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electronicpestrepeller.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (77%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electronic Pest Repeller. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

electronicpestrepeller.com

electronicpestrepeller.com

198 ms

pestrepellerultimate.com

pestrepellerultimate.com

179 ms

504 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

105 ms

style.css

style.css

199 ms

style.css

style.css

154 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

161 ms

styles.css

styles.css

212 ms

kd_vc_front.css

kd_vc_front.css

273 ms

ekko-font.css

ekko-font.css

170 ms

field_social_profiles_frontend.css

field_social_profiles_frontend.css

170 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

202 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

240 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

168 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

173 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

212 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

256 ms

kd_addon_script.js

kd_addon_script.js

256 ms

jquery.easytabs.min.js

jquery.easytabs.min.js

258 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

298 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

411 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

297 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

296 ms

index.js

index.js

405 ms

index.js

index.js

406 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

455 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

515 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

406 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

456 ms

a29229187e.js

a29229187e.js

160 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

406 ms

wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js

wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js

406 ms

api.js

api.js

105 ms

css

css

99 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

266 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

265 ms

GL-logo-white-small.png

GL-logo-white-small.png

170 ms

pest-category-header-min.jpg

pest-category-header-min.jpg

371 ms

at-feature-cateogry-min.png

at-feature-cateogry-min.png

499 ms

g5-feature-cateogry-min.png

g5-feature-cateogry-min.png

498 ms

traveler-feature-cateogry-min.png

traveler-feature-cateogry-min.png

603 ms

ssg-feature-cateogry-min.png

ssg-feature-cateogry-min.png

496 ms

guardian-front-no-remote_66148ae1-d4c3-41bd-8bcd-4135884102c0.png

guardian-front-no-remote_66148ae1-d4c3-41bd-8bcd-4135884102c0.png

600 ms

house-front-blue-min.jpg

house-front-blue-min.jpg

502 ms

ekko-font.woff

ekko-font.woff

336 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

328 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

329 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

317 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

292 ms

insight.beta.min.js

insight.beta.min.js

18 ms

Accessibility Review

electronicpestrepeller.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

electronicpestrepeller.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

electronicpestrepeller.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electronicpestrepeller.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electronicpestrepeller.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

electronicpestrepeller.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Electronic Pest Repeller. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: