Tools & Wizards About Us
electronics-review.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

electronics-review.ru

Электроника и бытовая техника - новинки, обзоры, тесты

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

215 ms

electronics-review.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Electronics Review content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about electronics-review.ru

Электроника и бытовая техника - новости и новинки, тесты, обзоры устройств и аксессуаров, советы рекомендации по выбору оборудования

Visit electronics-review.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Electronics-review.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

electronics-review.ru performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.electronics-review.ru

1085 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

styles.css

261 ms

css

26 ms

css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Electronics-review.ru, 15% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Electronics-review.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (80%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

477.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Electronics-review.ru main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 126.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electronics Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 529.6 kB

  • Original 730.3 kB
  • After minification 529.3 kB
  • After compression 200.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 529.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 137.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electronics-review.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (46%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electronics Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.electronics-review.ru

www.electronics-review.ru

1085 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

styles.css

styles.css

261 ms

css

css

26 ms

css

css

38 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

660 ms

style.css

style.css

795 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

451 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

286 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

watch.js

watch.js

4 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

283 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

387 ms

postviews-cache.js

postviews-cache.js

415 ms

tagdiv_theme.js

tagdiv_theme.js

977 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

517 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

544 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

579 ms

social-likes_flat.css

social-likes_flat.css

647 ms

social-likes.min.js

social-likes.min.js

708 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

32 ms

top100.cnt

top100.cnt

435 ms

elreview.jpg

elreview.jpg

198 ms

Philips-PX840_2-324x160.jpg

Philips-PX840_2-324x160.jpg

274 ms

VSX-1131-324x160.jpg

VSX-1131-324x160.jpg

198 ms

LG-PF1000U-324x160.jpg

LG-PF1000U-324x160.jpg

199 ms

ARCHOS-70-box-324x160.jpg

ARCHOS-70-box-324x160.jpg

199 ms

Archos-50E-05-F-324x160.jpg

Archos-50E-05-F-324x160.jpg

199 ms

HyperX-Savage2-324x160.jpg

HyperX-Savage2-324x160.jpg

273 ms

SSD_Q300_R_0403-324x160.jpg

SSD_Q300_R_0403-324x160.jpg

274 ms

I2481FXH-324x160.jpg

I2481FXH-324x160.jpg

274 ms

TMXproduct-1-324x160.jpg

TMXproduct-1-324x160.jpg

273 ms

microSD-Industrial-64GB-100x70.jpg

microSD-Industrial-64GB-100x70.jpg

431 ms

lat7000-100x70.jpg

lat7000-100x70.jpg

431 ms

275P4VYKEB_ftl_rflx-sc-100x70.jpg

275P4VYKEB_ftl_rflx-sc-100x70.jpg

432 ms

MLWG3_4-100x70.jpg

MLWG3_4-100x70.jpg

434 ms

Philips-FX10-1-100x70.jpg

Philips-FX10-1-100x70.jpg

432 ms

TG-870-green-100x70.jpg

TG-870-green-100x70.jpg

432 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

69 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

91 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

89 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

419 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

90 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf

90 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf

89 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

90 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

92 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

93 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

93 ms

ca-pub-7375705345480494.js

ca-pub-7375705345480494.js

75 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

73 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

72 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

ads

ads

254 ms

hit

hit

271 ms

osd.js

osd.js

7 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

38 ms

abg.js

abg.js

51 ms

hit

hit

147 ms

favicon

favicon

64 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

56 ms

mobile_unified_button_icon_white.png

mobile_unified_button_icon_white.png

29 ms

s

s

16 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

11 ms

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

electronics-review.ru accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

electronics-review.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

electronics-review.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electronics-review.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Electronics-review.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

electronics-review.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Electronics Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: