7.9 sec in total
978 ms
6.7 sec
270 ms
Visit electroweb.in now to see the best up-to-date Electroweb content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about electroweb.in
IT company in Gandhinagar for training, IT company in Gandhinagar Gujarat, Software company in Gandhinagar, list of software companies in Gandhinagar, embedded companies in Gandhinagar, Top it compani...
Visit electroweb.inWe analyzed Electroweb.in page load time and found that the first response time was 978 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
electroweb.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
978 ms
1565 ms
28 ms
770 ms
1002 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Electroweb.in, 11% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Electroweb.in.
Page size can be reduced by 835.2 kB (41%)
2.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Electroweb.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 823.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electroweb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.4 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 336.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electroweb.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 336.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (71%)
66
19
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electroweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
electroweb.in
978 ms
electroweb.in
1565 ms
platform.js
28 ms
style.css
770 ms
green.css
1002 ms
modernizr.js
1283 ms
jsapi
21 ms
loader.js
19 ms
jquery.min.js
18 ms
tinynav.js
794 ms
superfish.js
831 ms
hoverIntent.js
993 ms
jquery.sticky.js
997 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
1009 ms
camera.js
1308 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
1093 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1710 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1478 ms
carousel.js
1544 ms
jquery.tweet.js
1295 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
1356 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
1559 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
1824 ms
gmap3.js
1627 ms
jquery.isotope.js
1724 ms
jquery.cookies.js
1804 ms
bootstrap.js
2063 ms
main.js
1890 ms
bootstrap.css
1909 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
1451 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1536 ms
theme-options.css
1557 ms
animate.css
1900 ms
camera.css
1708 ms
flexslider.css
1790 ms
slide_flex_style.css
1800 ms
owl.carousel.css
1814 ms
owl.theme.css
1995 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
2045 ms
flickr.css
2066 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2090 ms
css
30 ms
sdk.js
98 ms
cse.js
14 ms
analytics.js
188 ms
logo.jpg
294 ms
example-bg.jpg
825 ms
arrow_footer.png
288 ms
cse.js
216 ms
facebook.jpg
290 ms
google.jpg
290 ms
linkedin.jpg
290 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
131 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
428 ms
sdk.js
109 ms
undefined
322 ms
ui.totop.png
441 ms
camera_skins.png
431 ms
camera-loader.gif
437 ms
4.jpg
1062 ms
collect
20 ms
js
74 ms
cse_element__en.js
12 ms
default+en.css
52 ms
greensky.css
51 ms
async-ads.js
28 ms
branding.png
95 ms
clear.png
89 ms
nav_logo114.png
90 ms
1.jpg
259 ms
like.php
101 ms
58qLQGXzUKe.js
27 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
12 ms
electroweb.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
electroweb.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
electroweb.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electroweb.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electroweb.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
electroweb.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Electroweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: