4.7 sec in total
816 ms
3.5 sec
355 ms
Click here to check amazing Eleganceinfosoft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eleganceinfosoft.com
Elegance Infosoft - Web Design & Development | PHP |Wordpress | Ecommerce Websites | Payment Gateway integration
Visit eleganceinfosoft.comWe analyzed Eleganceinfosoft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 816 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eleganceinfosoft.com performance score
816 ms
132 ms
284 ms
141 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (108 requests) were addressed to the original Eleganceinfosoft.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eleganceinfosoft.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (39%)
3.6 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Eleganceinfosoft.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eleganceinfosoft images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 251.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eleganceinfosoft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 251.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (61%)
115
45
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eleganceinfosoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eleganceinfosoft.com
816 ms
bootstrap.min.css
132 ms
font-awesome.css
284 ms
media.css
141 ms
style.css
197 ms
lightbox.css
196 ms
flexslider.css
211 ms
styles.css
198 ms
buttons.min.css
207 ms
dashicons.min.css
323 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
268 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
268 ms
media-views.min.css
271 ms
imgareaselect.css
272 ms
css
65 ms
genericons.css
391 ms
style.css
332 ms
sbar.css
334 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
333 ms
jquery.js
447 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
383 ms
utils.min.js
394 ms
plupload.full.min.js
525 ms
js
85 ms
jquery.appear.js
396 ms
jquery.form.min.js
421 ms
scripts.js
572 ms
underscore.min.js
577 ms
shortcode.min.js
410 ms
backbone.min.js
470 ms
wp-util.min.js
521 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
519 ms
media-models.min.js
570 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
569 ms
core.min.js
571 ms
widget.min.js
570 ms
mouse.min.js
595 ms
sortable.min.js
598 ms
api.js
38 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
627 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
540 ms
media-views.min.js
784 ms
media-editor.min.js
496 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
557 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
966 ms
functions.js
1980 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
558 ms
custom.js
589 ms
justgage.1.0.1.min.js
548 ms
raphael.2.1.0.min.js
672 ms
wp-embed.min.js
605 ms
lightbox-plus-jquery.js
784 ms
jquery.min.js
692 ms
script.js
667 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
710 ms
circle-progress.js
729 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
698 ms
analytics.js
4 ms
collect
35 ms
logo.png
547 ms
05.jpg
791 ms
04.jpg
835 ms
031.jpg
1092 ms
02.jpg
892 ms
01.jpg
1032 ms
06.jpg
1039 ms
ic_1.png
885 ms
ic_2.png
940 ms
ic_3.png
946 ms
collect
31 ms
ic_4.png
953 ms
ic_5.png
959 ms
ic_6.png
1014 ms
img2.png
1055 ms
connectus.png
1005 ms
images.png
1009 ms
opensans-regular.woff
1111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1056 ms
Oswald-Regular.ttf
1052 ms
oswald-light.woff
1040 ms
img31.png
1061 ms
ic_7.png
1040 ms
ic_8.png
1017 ms
user.png
977 ms
lg1_1.png
957 ms
lg2_2.png
955 ms
lg3_3.png
905 ms
lg4_4.png
1756 ms
lg5_5.png
854 ms
lg6_6.png
858 ms
lg7_7.png
869 ms
ic_11.png
845 ms
ic_12.png
839 ms
ic_13.png
841 ms
ic_14.png
937 ms
ic_15.png
891 ms
ic_16.png
1348 ms
ic_17.png
643 ms
top_bg.jpg
666 ms
weideabg.jpg
646 ms
feat_w_img11.jpg
1189 ms
feat_w_img21.jpg
862 ms
feat_w_img31.jpg
812 ms
feat_w_img4.jpg
805 ms
feat_w_img5.jpg
859 ms
feat_w_img6.jpg
854 ms
feat_w_img7.jpg
932 ms
feat_w_img8.jpg
886 ms
feat_w_img9.jpg
863 ms
feat_w_img10.jpg
919 ms
comnt_bg.jpg
916 ms
recaptcha__en.js
231 ms
prev.png
455 ms
next.png
477 ms
ajax-loader.gif
317 ms
fallback
33 ms
fallback__ltr.css
8 ms
payload
14 ms
css
15 ms
logo_48.png
10 ms
refresh.png
7 ms
audio.png
7 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
17 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
19 ms
eleganceinfosoft.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eleganceinfosoft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Eleganceinfosoft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eleganceinfosoft.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eleganceinfosoft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: