Tools & Wizards About Us
elegantpackaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

elegantpackaging.com

Custom Packaging Company | Specialty Product Container Solutions | Elegant Packaging

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

651 ms

Page Rendered

333 ms

elegantpackaging.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Elegant Packaging content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about elegantpackaging.com

Our job is Simple - to make what you make look INCREDIBLE! Call 800-367-5493 or Contact Us and let us help make your product stand out from the rest!

Visit elegantpackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Elegantpackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 984 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elegantpackaging.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.358

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elegantpackaging.com

121 ms

css

55 ms

DependencyHandler.axd

13 ms

site.css

29 ms

DependencyHandler.axd

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Elegantpackaging.com, 24% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 456.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elegantpackaging.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.6 kB, which is 55% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 154.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Elegant Packaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 154.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 348.6 kB
  • After minification 329.8 kB
  • After compression 307.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 216.9 kB

  • Original 270.3 kB
  • After minification 206.9 kB
  • After compression 53.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elegantpackaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (44%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elegant Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elegantpackaging.com

elegantpackaging.com

121 ms

css

css

55 ms

DependencyHandler.axd

DependencyHandler.axd

13 ms

site.css

site.css

29 ms

DependencyHandler.axd

DependencyHandler.axd

28 ms

js

js

259 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

27 ms

foundation.offcanvas.js

foundation.offcanvas.js

26 ms

foundation.topbar.js

foundation.topbar.js

26 ms

foundation.equalizer.js

foundation.equalizer.js

27 ms

site.js

site.js

36 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

css

css

27 ms

ga.js

ga.js

141 ms

made-in-usa.png

made-in-usa.png

139 ms

logo.png

logo.png

13 ms

hero_beyonce.jpg

hero_beyonce.jpg

12 ms

hero_chocolate.jpg

hero_chocolate.jpg

13 ms

hero_skinnygirl.jpg

hero_skinnygirl.jpg

85 ms

hero_surface.jpg

hero_surface.jpg

85 ms

canfield-cannonbalfinall.png

canfield-cannonbalfinall.png

86 ms

computercase2.png

computercase2.png

86 ms

student-case.png

student-case.png

88 ms

fashion2.png

fashion2.png

87 ms

contract2.png

contract2.png

89 ms

logo-rpa.jpg

logo-rpa.jpg

87 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

113 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

46 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

64 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

74 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

76 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

74 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

124 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

77 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

133 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

77 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

132 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

76 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

133 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

61 ms

PTS56F-webfont.woff

PTS56F-webfont.woff

60 ms

Accessibility Review

elegantpackaging.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

elegantpackaging.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

elegantpackaging.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elegantpackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elegantpackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elegantpackaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Elegant Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: