Tools & Wizards About Us
eleganttouch.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

eleganttouch.co.uk

Fake Nails | False Nails | Accessories | Elegant Touch UK

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

286 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

189 ms

eleganttouch.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eleganttouch.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Elegant Touch best content right away, or after learning these important things about eleganttouch.co.uk

Elegant Touch is the UK's most loved nail brand with a huge selection of styles & free UK delivery available.

Visit eleganttouch.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Eleganttouch.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eleganttouch.co.uk performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eleganttouch.co.uk

286 ms

www.eleganttouch.com

737 ms

js

78 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

117 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eleganttouch.co.uk, 79% (50 requests) were made to Eleganttouch.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to S.w.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Eleganttouch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 981.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

977.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eleganttouch.co.uk main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 766.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 65.8 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 80.4 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 766.2 kB
  • After minification 751.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elegant Touch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 446.6 kB

  • Original 590.0 kB
  • After minification 585.0 kB
  • After compression 143.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 446.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 453.6 kB

  • Original 522.0 kB
  • After minification 506.4 kB
  • After compression 68.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eleganttouch.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 453.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (36%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elegant Touch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eleganttouch.co.uk

eleganttouch.co.uk

286 ms

www.eleganttouch.com

www.eleganttouch.com

737 ms

js

js

78 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

117 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

235 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

524 ms

styles.css

styles.css

331 ms

square-thumbnails-public.css

square-thumbnails-public.css

344 ms

theme-bootstrap4.min.css

theme-bootstrap4.min.css

611 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

839 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

349 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

626 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

454 ms

square-thumbnails-public.js

square-thumbnails-public.js

455 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

564 ms

css2

css2

37 ms

all.css

all.css

667 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

648 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

687 ms

index.js

index.js

739 ms

theme-bootstrap4.min.js

theme-bootstrap4.min.js

897 ms

theme.js

theme.js

1076 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

index.js

index.js

793 ms

sbi-scripts.min.js

sbi-scripts.min.js

895 ms

logo-pink.png

logo-pink.png

110 ms

03-ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March-copy.jpg

03-ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March-copy.jpg

117 ms

2-ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March.jpg

2-ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March.jpg

287 ms

ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March-1440x550px-sheer-tin-photot.jpg

ET-Homepage-Banner-21-March-1440x550px-sheer-tin-photot.jpg

394 ms

logo-pink.png

logo-pink.png

114 ms

cosmopolitan.png

cosmopolitan.png

292 ms

glamour.png

glamour.png

296 ms

grazia.png

grazia.png

297 ms

tatler.png

tatler.png

306 ms

vogue.png

vogue.png

309 ms

whowhatwear.png

whowhatwear.png

402 ms

refinery29.png

refinery29.png

408 ms

stylist.png

stylist.png

400 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

412 ms

TRENDING-NOW-670x570px.jpg

TRENDING-NOW-670x570px.jpg

398 ms

NEW-IN-310x345px.jpg

NEW-IN-310x345px.jpg

488 ms

shape-finder.png

shape-finder.png

491 ms

LOOK-BOOK-310x345px.jpg

LOOK-BOOK-310x345px.jpg

591 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

499 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo18I.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo18I.woff

32 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o18I.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o18I.woff

46 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o18I.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o18I.woff

46 ms

1f334.svg

1f334.svg

89 ms

1f496.svg

1f496.svg

82 ms

1f60d.svg

1f60d.svg

82 ms

2728.svg

2728.svg

84 ms

23f1.svg

23f1.svg

83 ms

1f485-1f3fb.svg

1f485-1f3fb.svg

85 ms

348873493_525830256258693_4439044671967091473_nlow.jpg

348873493_525830256258693_4439044671967091473_nlow.jpg

240 ms

348271050_3007597806042822_4949948662223909192_nlow.jpg

348271050_3007597806042822_4949948662223909192_nlow.jpg

239 ms

347357364_1861128434270191_4879347947542113162_nlow.jpg

347357364_1861128434270191_4879347947542113162_nlow.jpg

326 ms

347438048_632313285453187_2815757943044378791_nlow.jpg

347438048_632313285453187_2815757943044378791_nlow.jpg

329 ms

346918138_966659057806444_5800813804720242166_nlow.jpg

346918138_966659057806444_5800813804720242166_nlow.jpg

340 ms

346897289_1265773457646898_8423089822744980972_nlow.jpg

346897289_1265773457646898_8423089822744980972_nlow.jpg

338 ms

346091973_899234707802322_6593365308240788199_nlow.jpg

346091973_899234707802322_6593365308240788199_nlow.jpg

341 ms

345689366_193691746885445_8754611592593990270_nlow.jpg

345689366_193691746885445_8754611592593990270_nlow.jpg

441 ms

345411817_760369575577364_7963597699842314980_nlow.jpg

345411817_760369575577364_7963597699842314980_nlow.jpg

457 ms

343587623_151912627803244_2731896237775342557_nlow.jpg

343587623_151912627803244_2731896237775342557_nlow.jpg

455 ms

Accessibility Review

eleganttouch.co.uk accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eleganttouch.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eleganttouch.co.uk SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eleganttouch.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eleganttouch.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eleganttouch.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elegant Touch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: