1.8 sec in total
261 ms
1.1 sec
423 ms
Visit element11.com now to see the best up-to-date Element 11 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about element11.com
We merge creative design with innovative technology solutions to create successful digital communication between organizations and the people they serve.
Visit element11.comWe analyzed Element11.com page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
element11.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value1,550 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
261 ms
126 ms
150 ms
79 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Element11.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Element11.com.
Page size can be reduced by 92.4 kB (23%)
396.9 kB
304.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Element11.com main page is 396.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 218.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Element 11 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (85%)
62
9
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Element 11. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
element11.com
261 ms
element11.com
126 ms
cvy7aqg.css
150 ms
frontend.css
79 ms
style.min.css
127 ms
theme.min.css
158 ms
header-footer.min.css
72 ms
frontend.min.css
152 ms
swiper.min.css
149 ms
post-582.css
99 ms
frontend.min.css
136 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
129 ms
post-455.css
166 ms
post-618.css
201 ms
post-608.css
200 ms
post-719.css
213 ms
style.css
225 ms
chosen.min.css
286 ms
jet-search.css
202 ms
jquery.min.js
291 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
268 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
231 ms
js
73 ms
post-606.css
271 ms
animations.min.css
387 ms
underscore.min.js
264 ms
wp-util.min.js
386 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
393 ms
jet-plugins.js
395 ms
jet-search.js
396 ms
uael-nav-menu.min.js
396 ms
jquery_resize.min.js
394 ms
js_cookie.min.js
397 ms
api.js
49 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
396 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
396 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
425 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
612 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
397 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
424 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
431 ms
hooks.min.js
373 ms
i18n.min.js
365 ms
frontend.min.js
334 ms
waypoints.min.js
489 ms
core.min.js
344 ms
swiper.min.js
475 ms
p.css
34 ms
share-link.min.js
472 ms
dialog.min.js
466 ms
frontend.min.js
463 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
453 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
422 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
421 ms
E11-icon-reversed-orange-ring.svg
296 ms
E11-wordmark-reversed.svg
293 ms
E11-logo-dark.svg
294 ms
whiteboarding-768x512.jpg
297 ms
gray-circle-01.svg
290 ms
js
65 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
d
199 ms
d
225 ms
recaptcha__en.js
51 ms
d
198 ms
d
196 ms
collect
140 ms
collect
95 ms
element11.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
element11.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
element11.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Element11.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Element11.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
element11.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Element 11. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: