Access elementtechnologies.net. Business Development Consultancy

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

elementtechnologies.net

1294 ms

autoptimize_6b7962c4c93f657e8f870b3f1ade1c5e.css

170 ms

css

40 ms

js

80 ms

style_dynamic.php

951 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Elementtechnologies.net, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Elementtechnologies.net.

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Elementtechnologies.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 157.3 kB

Original 186.5 kB
After minification 185.2 kB
After compression 29.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 997.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elementtechnologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 489.7 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB
After compression 683.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 489.7 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

Original 217.4 kB
After minification 174.2 kB
After compression 129.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elementtechnologies.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elementtechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elementtechnologies.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elementtechnologies.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elementtechnologies.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elementtechnologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Business Development Consultancy | Consulting Services In USA

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

elementtechnologies.net

autoptimize_6b7962c4c93f657e8f870b3f1ade1c5e.css

css

js

style_dynamic.php

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

elementtechnologies.net

autoptimize_6b7962c4c93f657e8f870b3f1ade1c5e.css

css

js

style_dynamic.php

style_dynamic_responsive.php

custom_css.php

css

frontend-gtag.min.js

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

js

js

n2.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

autoptimize_single_1989ac9c9ce5bdec42b51a6ce4e7683e.js

widgets.js

in.js

lazysizes.min.js

autoptimize_single_7be65ac27024c7b5686f9d7c49690799.js

autoptimize_single_5bc2b1fa970f9cecb3c30c0c92c98271.js

dlm-xhr.min.js

autoptimize_single_88e1662ca98220a4a826bd3fdf520073.js

core.min.js

autoptimize_single_6c3115bed3eae9252ca78da319ef53eb.js

fslightbox.min.js

swiper.min.js

main.min.js

autoptimize_single_f9e3975e0c4c67cc095ff3a3d59a1362.js

autoptimize_single_314b7d1d365b6ba87c0fbdbde3ece82b.js

default_dynamic.php

default.min.js

custom_js.php

comment-reply.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

Greenlight-Implementation-Partner-BG.jpg

Specialities-elabs-bg.jpg

elementtechnologies.net

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf