Tools & Wizards About Us
elifeservices.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

elifeservices.in

eLife Cable TV Software | Cable Payments Software | Cable Software | Cable Software for Billing| Cable Accounts Software | Cable Billing Machine | Cab...

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

948 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

209 ms

elifeservices.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ELife Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about elifeservices.in

eLife provides a complete billing solution for local cable operators accross INDIA, with high quality servcice at low maintainance cost

Visit elifeservices.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Elifeservices.in page load time and found that the first response time was 948 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elifeservices.in performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.128

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elifeservices.in

948 ms

grid.css

453 ms

style.css

685 ms

camera.css

461 ms

owl.carousel.css

459 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Elifeservices.in, 27% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Elifeservices.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 545.7 kB (59%)

Content Size

930.7 kB

After Optimization

385.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elifeservices.in main page is 930.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 468.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 184.9 kB

  • Original 335.2 kB
  • After minification 150.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ELife Services needs image optimization as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 55% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 247.7 kB

  • Original 468.0 kB
  • After minification 401.2 kB
  • After compression 220.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 247.7 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 94.1 kB

  • Original 104.1 kB
  • After minification 79.5 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elifeservices.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (77%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ELife Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elifeservices.in

elifeservices.in

948 ms

grid.css

grid.css

453 ms

style.css

style.css

685 ms

camera.css

camera.css

461 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

459 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

922 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

465 ms

jquery.equalheights.js

jquery.equalheights.js

675 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

686 ms

camera.js

camera.js

1149 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

930 ms

script.js

script.js

668 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

animate.css

animate.css

507 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

40 ms

logo.png

logo.png

240 ms

index_img01.png

index_img01.png

233 ms

index_img02.png

index_img02.png

232 ms

default

default

81 ms

c.php

c.php

43 ms

font

font

14 ms

font

font

117 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

23 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

236 ms

device.min.js

device.min.js

229 ms

tmstickup.js

tmstickup.js

234 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

374 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

375 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

382 ms

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

451 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

461 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

463 ms

jquery.unveil.js

jquery.unveil.js

602 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

236 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

688 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

67 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

68 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

65 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

77 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

67 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

74 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

76 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

81 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

93 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

82 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

94 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

93 ms

index_slide01.jpg

index_slide01.jpg

704 ms

widget-settings

widget-settings

81 ms

en.js

en.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

elifeservices.in accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

elifeservices.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

elifeservices.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elifeservices.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elifeservices.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elifeservices.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ELife Services. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: