Tools & Wizards About Us
elinton.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

elinton.com

Edgar F. Linton Jr. - Licensed private investigator in Altoona, Blair County PA

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

elinton.com screenshot

About Website

Visit elinton.com now to see the best up-to-date E Linton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about elinton.com

Visit elinton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Elinton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elinton.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.21

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elinton.com

153 ms

elinton.com

379 ms

widgetkit-681773b2.css

126 ms

mootools-core.js

250 ms

core.js

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Elinton.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (504 ms) belongs to the original domain Elinton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

966.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elinton.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 837.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 837.1 kB
  • After minification 827.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Linton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 140.2 kB
  • After minification 140.2 kB
  • After compression 111.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 50.6 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elinton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (75%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Linton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elinton.com

elinton.com

153 ms

elinton.com

elinton.com

379 ms

widgetkit-681773b2.css

widgetkit-681773b2.css

126 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

250 ms

core.js

core.js

185 ms

caption.js

caption.js

184 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

305 ms

widgetkit-e1b149a6.js

widgetkit-e1b149a6.js

204 ms

base.css

base.css

187 ms

layout.css

layout.css

247 ms

menus.css

menus.css

270 ms

modules.css

modules.css

271 ms

tools.css

tools.css

270 ms

system.css

system.css

327 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

328 ms

custom.css

custom.css

329 ms

animation.css

animation.css

330 ms

opensans.css

opensans.css

332 ms

signika.css

signika.css

368 ms

opensans.css

opensans.css

373 ms

style.css

style.css

375 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

376 ms

print.css

print.css

387 ms

opensans.css

opensans.css

395 ms

signika.css

signika.css

432 ms

warp.js

warp.js

437 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

441 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

441 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

446 ms

template.js

template.js

459 ms

search.js

search.js

504 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

184 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

195 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

186 ms

base.css

base.css

198 ms

layout.css

layout.css

201 ms

menus.css

menus.css

246 ms

modules.css

modules.css

246 ms

tools.css

tools.css

256 ms

system.css

system.css

262 ms

system.css

system.css

257 ms

system-all.css

system-all.css

261 ms

custom.css

custom.css

306 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

259 ms

print.css

print.css

261 ms

logo_red.png

logo_red.png

69 ms

searchbox_magnifier.png

searchbox_magnifier.png

69 ms

teaser_blank.png

teaser_blank.png

418 ms

pali-logo-2.png

pali-logo-2.png

74 ms

Twitter-Logo.png

Twitter-Logo.png

73 ms

naassoc.png

naassoc.png

126 ms

palicense.png

palicense.png

192 ms

REELogo.png

REELogo.png

138 ms

likebox.php

likebox.php

251 ms

infinite_teaser1_red.jpg

infinite_teaser1_red.jpg

365 ms

list_check_white.png

list_check_white.png

133 ms

module_box_transparency20.png

module_box_transparency20.png

183 ms

line_bg.png

line_bg.png

199 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

201 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

230 ms

totop_scroller.png

totop_scroller.png

218 ms

Signika-Light-webfont.woff

Signika-Light-webfont.woff

236 ms

HADo6_noYei.css

HADo6_noYei.css

14 ms

Uq3QOVza5tw.js

Uq3QOVza5tw.js

29 ms

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

27 ms

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

28 ms

xNa_5SPtPNu.js

xNa_5SPtPNu.js

60 ms

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

60 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

59 ms

277590414_502557794897859_6661396754581991602_n.jpg

277590414_502557794897859_6661396754581991602_n.jpg

32 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

4 ms

Accessibility Review

elinton.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

elinton.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

elinton.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elinton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elinton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elinton.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Linton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: