Tools & Wizards About Us
elitemarking.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

elitemarking.co.uk

Elite Marking Systems : Bespoke Luxury Packaging, Carrier Bags, Packaging & Labels

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

elitemarking.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to elitemarking.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Elite Marking best content right away, or after learning these important things about elitemarking.co.uk

Specialists in Luxury Carrier Bags, Labels and Bespoke Packaging for Events, Exhibitions, eCommerce and Retail. Express delivery available.

Visit elitemarking.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Elitemarking.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

elitemarking.co.uk performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

elitemarking.co.uk

336 ms

elitemarking.com

1538 ms

js

274 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

193 ms

style.min.css

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Elitemarking.co.uk, 69% (36 requests) were made to Elitemarking.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Elitemarking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Elitemarking.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 164.6 kB

  • Original 177.2 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.6 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 72.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elite Marking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 68.1 kB
  • After compression 65.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 28.0 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elitemarking.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (51%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elite Marking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

elitemarking.co.uk

elitemarking.co.uk

336 ms

elitemarking.com

elitemarking.com

1538 ms

js

js

274 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

193 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

317 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

500 ms

styles.css

styles.css

497 ms

sopro-plugin-public.css

sopro-plugin-public.css

486 ms

css

css

155 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

571 ms

slick.css

slick.css

486 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

484 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

500 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

742 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

662 ms

sopro-plugin-public.js

sopro-plugin-public.js

568 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

625 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

627 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

719 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

720 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

661 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

255 ms

js

js

101 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

126 ms

collect

collect

128 ms

562 ms

Elite_Luxury_Paper_Carrier_Bags-9.jpg

Elite_Luxury_Paper_Carrier_Bags-9.jpg

1970 ms

logo-color.svg

logo-color.svg

349 ms

elite-logo.png

elite-logo.png

374 ms

luxury-bags-bg.jpg

luxury-bags-bg.jpg

777 ms

luxury-bag.svg

luxury-bag.svg

338 ms

IMG_0157-edit.jpg

IMG_0157-edit.jpg

623 ms

kraft-bag.svg

kraft-bag.svg

328 ms

basepoke-box-bg.jpg

basepoke-box-bg.jpg

621 ms

basepoke-box.svg

basepoke-box.svg

354 ms

ecommerce-packaging-bg.jpg

ecommerce-packaging-bg.jpg

754 ms

ecommerce-packaging.svg

ecommerce-packaging.svg

328 ms

EPSON_ColorWorks_C7500_4.jpg

EPSON_ColorWorks_C7500_4.jpg

1161 ms

printer-512.svg

printer-512.svg

373 ms

home-intro-bg.svg

home-intro-bg.svg

579 ms

Elite-Marking-Ink-3.png

Elite-Marking-Ink-3.png

1213 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

712 ms

exp-img.png

exp-img.png

964 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

400 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

579 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

667 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

620 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

634 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

625 ms

622 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

391 ms

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

beacon-v2.helpscout.net

31 ms

Accessibility Review

elitemarking.co.uk accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

elitemarking.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

elitemarking.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elitemarking.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elitemarking.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

elitemarking.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elite Marking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: