6.3 sec in total
262 ms
5.6 sec
405 ms
Visit elizabethnorman.com now to see the best up-to-date Elizabeth Norman content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about elizabethnorman.com
Elizabeth Norman International are experts in talent solutions for the Insights profession, with over 34 years of experience recruiting in this space.
Visit elizabethnorman.comWe analyzed Elizabethnorman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
elizabethnorman.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value32.7 s
0/100
10%
Value29,300 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value44.4 s
0/100
10%
262 ms
587 ms
55 ms
71 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Elizabethnorman.com, 19% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Elizabethnorman.com.
Page size can be reduced by 327.2 kB (35%)
946.3 kB
619.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Elizabethnorman.com main page is 946.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 351.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 226.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elizabeth Norman images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 165 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 92.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elizabethnorman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (47%)
59
31
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elizabeth Norman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
elizabethnorman.com
262 ms
www.elizabethnorman.com
587 ms
js
55 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
30a23.css
136 ms
a5ff7.css
206 ms
19a13.css
413 ms
b98b0.css
492 ms
e2547.js
282 ms
13eca.js
302 ms
e0c07.js
589 ms
7cb2e.js
297 ms
aa812.js
457 ms
2926b.css
585 ms
css
88 ms
css
103 ms
css
110 ms
edd85.css
383 ms
a606d.js
470 ms
5ec63.js
582 ms
ef822.js
581 ms
c66f5.js
583 ms
44ee1.js
583 ms
633e3.js
763 ms
api.js
92 ms
b3df2.js
764 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
35 ms
ga-audiences
46 ms
css
86 ms
hf.js
723 ms
fbevents.js
157 ms
logo_sticky1.png
228 ms
logo_website1.png
229 ms
dummy.png
146 ms
dummy-transparent-ppfqrto4p3aeuns32f1cn5m9kyaqf94nab3xl5wfo0.png
229 ms
icon_twitter_small.png
229 ms
ipad_retina.png
144 ms
mhfa-badge.png
230 ms
image001-1024x1024.png
649 ms
trn-logo.jpg
317 ms
apsco_logo.jpg
317 ms
lftracker_v1_lAxoEaKZ3Go4OYGd.js
211 ms
selectbox-arrow.png
208 ms
freuds.png
208 ms
halls_partners.png
207 ms
whitbread.png
537 ms
kantar.png
538 ms
ab_worldfoods.png
538 ms
toluna.png
538 ms
ipg_media_brands.png
537 ms
krispy_kreme.png
634 ms
global_web_index_logo-1.png
636 ms
ocado.png
633 ms
pwc.png
635 ms
diageo.png
633 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
174 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
468 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
509 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
508 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
508 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
507 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
508 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
594 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexQ.ttf
510 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
510 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
593 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
593 ms
instagram.png
517 ms
1794078904181592
385 ms
tr.lfeeder.com
463 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
371 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
370 ms
recaptcha__en.js
139 ms
67164844-5ff4-4055-8bcf-4154a5736595
111 ms
elizabethnorman.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
elizabethnorman.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
elizabethnorman.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elizabethnorman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elizabethnorman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
elizabethnorman.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elizabeth Norman. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: