Tools & Wizards About Us
ellicium.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ellicium.com

Data Science Consulting Services & Strategies - Ellicium

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

834 ms

Page Rendered

302 ms

ellicium.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ellicium.com homepage info - get ready to check Ellicium best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ellicium.com

Business Intelligence & Data Visualization Navigate complexities and identify growth opportunities with our clear roadmap of success. Learn More >> Data Platform and Big Data Harness the full potentia...

Visit ellicium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ellicium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ellicium.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.137

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ellicium.com

79 ms

ellicium.com

129 ms

style-blocks.build.css

39 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

41 ms

fea-style.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Ellicium.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Kit.fontawesome.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (539 ms) relates to the external source Sc.lfeeder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 417.9 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ellicium.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 762.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 405.3 kB

  • Original 453.5 kB
  • After minification 451.9 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 405.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 57.0 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ellicium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 762.4 kB
  • After minification 762.4 kB
  • After compression 753.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 150.1 kB
  • After minification 150.1 kB
  • After compression 146.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ellicium.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (62%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ellicium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ellicium.com

ellicium.com

79 ms

ellicium.com

ellicium.com

129 ms

style-blocks.build.css

style-blocks.build.css

39 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

41 ms

fea-style.css

fea-style.css

34 ms

testimonial.css

testimonial.css

36 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

37 ms

ee8eb13be30e03397a0ea46c5a60383a.min.css

ee8eb13be30e03397a0ea46c5a60383a.min.css

63 ms

3d43aaa01e.js

3d43aaa01e.js

211 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

55 ms

js

js

211 ms

css

css

45 ms

revolution.addon.lottie.css

revolution.addon.lottie.css

47 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

48 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

184 ms

intl-tel-input.min.css

intl-tel-input.min.css

51 ms

39941086.js

39941086.js

207 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

201 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

203 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

206 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

202 ms

bootstrap.transition.js

bootstrap.transition.js

203 ms

bootstrap.tab.js

bootstrap.tab.js

202 ms

fea-main.js

fea-main.js

203 ms

testimonial.js

testimonial.js

218 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

342 ms

revolution.addon.lottie.min.js

revolution.addon.lottie.min.js

217 ms

6233d712d71ad97a6af7b47da72fc921.min.js

6233d712d71ad97a6af7b47da72fc921.min.js

342 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

341 ms

custom-captcha.min.js

custom-captcha.min.js

341 ms

choices.min.js

choices.min.js

340 ms

module.intl-tel-input.min.js

module.intl-tel-input.min.js

340 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

344 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

345 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

344 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

345 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

374 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

lftracker_v1_JMvZ8gbmGrPa2pOd.js

lftracker_v1_JMvZ8gbmGrPa2pOd.js

539 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

168 ms

tableau.png

tableau.png

196 ms

Power-BI.png

Power-BI.png

195 ms

Cloudera.png

Cloudera.png

196 ms

Snowflake.png

Snowflake.png

194 ms

DataRobot.png

DataRobot.png

195 ms

Microsoft-Azure.png

Microsoft-Azure.png

272 ms

AWS.png

AWS.png

272 ms

UIPath.png

UIPath.png

272 ms

Overledge.png

Overledge.png

272 ms

SingleStore.png

SingleStore.png

272 ms

R.png

R.png

273 ms

Paython.png

Paython.png

274 ms

Google-Cloud.png

Google-Cloud.png

274 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

297 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

260 ms

AmsiPro-Light.woff

AmsiPro-Light.woff

293 ms

Automation-Anywhere.png

Automation-Anywhere.png

277 ms

Informatica.png

Informatica.png

291 ms

MicroStrategy.png

MicroStrategy.png

336 ms

ThoughtSpot-1.png

ThoughtSpot-1.png

346 ms

Databricks.png

Databricks.png

322 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

248 ms

banner.js

banner.js

184 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

273 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

183 ms

39941086.js

39941086.js

183 ms

Qlick.png

Qlick.png

310 ms

dataiku.png

dataiku.png

309 ms

Alteryx-1.png

Alteryx-1.png

308 ms

Confluent.png

Confluent.png

214 ms

AmsiPro-Regular.woff

AmsiPro-Regular.woff

230 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

217 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

252 ms

AmsiPro-Bold.woff

AmsiPro-Bold.woff

253 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

Accessibility Review

ellicium.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ellicium.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ellicium.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ellicium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ellicium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ellicium.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ellicium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: