6.4 sec in total
777 ms
5.4 sec
272 ms
Welcome to em.no homepage info - get ready to check Em best content right away, or after learning these important things about em.no
Elektriker i Oslo og Akershus? Utfører alle typer elektrikeroppdrag, alt fra små til store prosjekter. Leverer kun produkter fra kjente kvalitetsmerker. >>
Visit em.noWe analyzed Em.no page load time and found that the first response time was 777 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
em.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
777 ms
42 ms
116 ms
233 ms
340 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Em.no, 8% (7 requests) were made to Log.cookieyes.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Em.no.
Page size can be reduced by 126.1 kB (8%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Em.no main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Em images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Em.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (71%)
72
21
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Em. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
em.no
777 ms
script.js
42 ms
style.css
116 ms
accessible-slick-theme.min.css
233 ms
responsive.css
340 ms
cv.css
342 ms
style.min.css
454 ms
styles.css
344 ms
blue.css
344 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
344 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
565 ms
modernizr.custom.js
453 ms
ddlevelsmenu.js
453 ms
ddlevelsmenu-invoke.js
454 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
452 ms
js
74 ms
addthis_widget.js
29 ms
shortcodes.css
562 ms
index.js
563 ms
index.js
555 ms
cv.js
556 ms
ie.js
662 ms
form-processor.js
662 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
664 ms
jquery.polyglot.language.switcher.js
665 ms
tinynav.min.js
665 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
666 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
773 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
772 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.min.js
897 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
775 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
777 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
779 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
885 ms
jquery.tweet.js
884 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
887 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
889 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
891 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
999 ms
log
412 ms
css
36 ms
css
52 ms
css
62 ms
html5-reset.css
903 ms
polyglot-language-switcher.css
792 ms
flexslider.css
687 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
688 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
1432 ms
shortcodes.css
793 ms
comment-reply.min.js
792 ms
custom.js
684 ms
slick.min.js
685 ms
SliderFullGallery.js
685 ms
farmer.png
451 ms
em__logo.png
169 ms
utelys_blaa.jpg
785 ms
utstilling_blaa-e1543846106730.jpg
338 ms
damekjokken_blaa.jpg
379 ms
nobo_blaa-e1543847104842.jpg
380 ms
majorstua_blaa.jpg
618 ms
Fridom1-e1543846664504.jpg
452 ms
fastelektriker.png
495 ms
pdf-logo.png
496 ms
elkofront-1024x529.png
683 ms
em__logo-300x74.png
582 ms
home.png
596 ms
phone.png
596 ms
mail.png
682 ms
clock.png
709 ms
sJoA3LZUhMSAPV_u0qwiAQ-O5Xo.ttf
114 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
138 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
143 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
143 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
143 ms
blank.htm
930 ms
scroll-top.png
563 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1072 ms
slick.woff
1142 ms
log
236 ms
log
366 ms
addthis_widget.js
44 ms
alert-56.png
235 ms
arrow-right.png
234 ms
blank.htm
458 ms
slick.ttf
452 ms
log
308 ms
log
286 ms
log
533 ms
addthis_widget.js
119 ms
log
398 ms
slick.svg
420 ms
em.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
em.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
em.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Em.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Em.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
em.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Em. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: