7.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
4.7 sec
176 ms
Click here to check amazing Email Spider content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about email-spider.net
We provide best software to our customer email extractor, find and replace, word count. Our data copy software is unique software in the market.
Visit email-spider.netWe analyzed Email-spider.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
email-spider.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
2487 ms
238 ms
172 ms
226 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Email-spider.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Email-spider.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (77%)
1.6 MB
369.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Email-spider.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 818.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Email Spider needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 617.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 617.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 578.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Email-spider.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 578.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (86%)
81
11
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email Spider. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.email-spider.net
2487 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
238 ms
style.css
172 ms
wp-filebase.css
226 ms
front.css
197 ms
font-awesome.min.css
218 ms
bootstrap.css
276 ms
front.css
241 ms
frontend.css
296 ms
fonts.css
297 ms
flexible-faq.css
323 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
311 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
330 ms
calendar-jos.css
346 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
353 ms
bootstrap.min.css
430 ms
font-awesome.min.css
383 ms
front.css
403 ms
select2.css
397 ms
bootstrap-breadcrumbs.css
414 ms
jquery-ui.css
446 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css
499 ms
rateit.css
474 ms
wp_shopping_cart_style.css
506 ms
style.css
489 ms
animate.min.css
522 ms
flexslider.css
499 ms
jquery.js
641 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
573 ms
bootstrap.min.js
574 ms
front.js
581 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
604 ms
widget.min.js
598 ms
frontend.js
666 ms
core.min.js
665 ms
mouse.min.js
669 ms
js
76 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
61 ms
red.css
656 ms
slider.min.js
513 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
522 ms
jelly.min.js
524 ms
file-upload.js
521 ms
calendar.js
520 ms
css
69 ms
calendar_function.js
503 ms
bootstrap.min.js
477 ms
mustache.js
499 ms
sha256.js
516 ms
datepicker.min.js
520 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js
575 ms
select2.js
568 ms
jquery.rateit.min.js
516 ms
keyboard-image-navigation.js
542 ms
Inview.js
510 ms
animate.js
507 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
527 ms
flexslider-init.js
554 ms
common.js
573 ms
jquery.collapse.js
569 ms
smooth.accordion.js
541 ms
jquery.form.min.js
517 ms
flexible-faq.js
515 ms
button.min.js
541 ms
spinner.min.js
567 ms
effect.min.js
541 ms
effect-shake.min.js
505 ms
sortable.min.js
505 ms
draggable.min.js
500 ms
droppable.min.js
509 ms
small-menu.js
535 ms
smoothscroll.js
505 ms
wp-embed.min.js
476 ms
email-spider.png
274 ms
logo2.png
270 ms
search.png
269 ms
archive.png
270 ms
down-green.png
270 ms
top_button.png
270 ms
avangate.png
153 ms
paypal.png
149 ms
help.png
158 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
246 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
299 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
383 ms
email-spider.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
email-spider.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
email-spider.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Email-spider.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Email-spider.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
email-spider.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Email Spider. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: