Tools & Wizards About Us
emailmarker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

emailmarker.com

Email Verification Service - Email Deliverability - Check Email Address

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

220 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

288 ms

emailmarker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Email Marker content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emailmarker.com

Emailmarker is a trusted solution for email list cleaning service. Our online system provides email verification service of your digital marketing needs.

Visit emailmarker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emailmarker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emailmarker.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emailmarker.com

220 ms

www.emailmarker.com

323 ms

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

style.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Emailmarker.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) belongs to the original domain Emailmarker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

361.1 kB

After Optimization

332.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emailmarker.com main page is 361.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 165.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 27.9 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 165.7 kB
  • After minification 164.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Email Marker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 130.3 kB
  • After minification 130.3 kB
  • After compression 127.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 37.3 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emailmarker.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (50%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email Marker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emailmarker.com

emailmarker.com

220 ms

www.emailmarker.com

www.emailmarker.com

323 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

custom.css

custom.css

61 ms

js

js

112 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

31 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

38 ms

createjs.min.js

createjs.min.js

39 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

38 ms

main.js

main.js

32 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

130 ms

css

css

36 ms

font.css

font.css

15 ms

hostio.css

hostio.css

20 ms

hotjar-358424.js

hotjar-358424.js

208 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

177 ms

qevents.js

qevents.js

206 ms

logo.png

logo.png

46 ms

l.js

l.js

198 ms

boost_roi.png

boost_roi.png

148 ms

email_verification.png

email_verification.png

148 ms

verify_email.png

verify_email.png

147 ms

f-1.png

f-1.png

146 ms

f-2.png

f-2.png

148 ms

f-3.png

f-3.png

147 ms

f-4.png

f-4.png

174 ms

f-5.png

f-5.png

174 ms

f-6.png

f-6.png

176 ms

pricing-mail.png

pricing-mail.png

175 ms

cloud1.png

cloud1.png

175 ms

cloud2.png

cloud2.png

175 ms

cloud3.png

cloud3.png

175 ms

166 ms

Montserrat-Regular.otf

Montserrat-Regular.otf

453 ms

font

font

172 ms

Montserrat-Light.otf

Montserrat-Light.otf

453 ms

Montserrat-SemiBold.otf

Montserrat-SemiBold.otf

443 ms

hostio.woff

hostio.woff

277 ms

Montserrat-Bold.otf

Montserrat-Bold.otf

424 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

500 ms

pixel

pixel

41 ms

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

40 ms

47 ms

Accessibility Review

emailmarker.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emailmarker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emailmarker.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emailmarker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emailmarker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emailmarker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Email Marker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: