Tools & Wizards About Us
emapa.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

emapa.pl

Technologie mapowe - zarządzanie transportem, optymalizacja tras i analizy przestrzenne – Emapa

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

3.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

555 ms

emapa.pl screenshot

About Website

Visit emapa.pl now to see the best up-to-date Emapa content for Poland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emapa.pl

Dostarczamy programy i narzędzia służące m.in. do zarządzania transportem i optymalizacji tras w oparciu o najdokładniejszą mapę cyfrową Polski. Oszczędzaj dzięki naszym rozwiązaniom!

Visit emapa.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Emapa.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emapa.pl performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.313

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

3414 ms

gtm.js

62 ms

css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

118 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

276 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Emapa.pl, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Emapa.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

596.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Emapa.pl main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 325.7 kB

  • Original 401.4 kB
  • After minification 401.4 kB
  • After compression 75.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 325.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-100%

Potential reduce by 68.5 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 68 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emapa needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.5 kB or 100% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 759.2 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 520.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 759.2 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emapa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

3414 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

css

css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

118 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

276 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

317 ms

cs.6f62d0f.js

cs.6f62d0f.js

603 ms

index.js

index.js

415 ms

index.js

index.js

414 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

806 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

966 ms

x.js

x.js

415 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

490 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

509 ms

nicescroll.js

nicescroll.js

740 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

577 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

605 ms

index.js

index.js

668 ms

emapa_logo.svg

emapa_logo.svg

549 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

556 ms

koszty_flota.svg

koszty_flota.svg

738 ms

narzedzia_optymalizacja.svg

narzedzia_optymalizacja.svg

736 ms

analizy.svg

analizy.svg

733 ms

harmonogram.svg

harmonogram.svg

741 ms

optymalizacja.svg

optymalizacja.svg

742 ms

dostawy.svg

dostawy.svg

828 ms

emapa_logo_A.png

emapa_logo_A.png

828 ms

optymalizacja2.svg

optymalizacja2.svg

774 ms

checkbox.svg

checkbox.svg

777 ms

koszty_flota2.svg

koszty_flota2.svg

776 ms

head2.svg

head2.svg

812 ms

narzedzia_optymalizacja2.svg

narzedzia_optymalizacja2.svg

848 ms

dostawy2.svg

dostawy2.svg

822 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

55 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

72 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

108 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

838 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

821 ms

logo_ue_pl.svg

logo_ue_pl.svg

759 ms

ncbr_logo_z_czerwonym_napisem_q.svg

ncbr_logo_z_czerwonym_napisem_q.svg

786 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

127 ms

Accessibility Review

emapa.pl accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

emapa.pl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emapa.pl SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emapa.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emapa.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emapa.pl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emapa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: