1.8 sec in total
421 ms
1.2 sec
194 ms
Welcome to emarked.com homepage info - get ready to check Emarked best content for Colombia right away, or after learning these important things about emarked.com
Visit emarked.comWe analyzed Emarked.com page load time and found that the first response time was 421 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
emarked.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.455
20/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
421 ms
262 ms
251 ms
251 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Emarked.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (421 ms) belongs to the original domain Emarked.com.
Page size can be reduced by 155.1 kB (34%)
461.4 kB
306.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Emarked.com main page is 461.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 247.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emarked images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emarked.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)
44
28
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emarked. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
emarked.com
421 ms
style.css
262 ms
960.css
251 ms
screen.css
251 ms
theme-light-blue.css
242 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
259 ms
jquery.js
393 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
302 ms
hoverIntent.js
292 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
281 ms
superfish.js
287 ms
supersubs.js
287 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1.min.js
315 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
336 ms
general.js
335 ms
comment-reply.min.js
333 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
ga.js
25 ms
emarked_logo.png
76 ms
facebook.png
77 ms
twitter.png
77 ms
Layers_header.jpg
76 ms
liqd_header.jpg
74 ms
CoinLeaf_header.jpg
106 ms
cloud_rabbit_header.jpg
105 ms
sija2_header.jpg
175 ms
tripped.jpg
205 ms
zuked_header.jpg
202 ms
3ls_feature1.jpg
196 ms
qubz_header.jpg
180 ms
tennis_feature.png
178 ms
howly_feature.jpg
240 ms
liqd_icon-160x120.jpg
217 ms
CoinLeaf_header_icon1-160x120.jpg
236 ms
cloud_rabbit_icon-160x120.jpg
226 ms
layers_icon-160x120.jpg
235 ms
sija-160x120.jpg
236 ms
tripped_1-160x120.jpg
259 ms
zuked-160x120.jpg
289 ms
wyna1-160x120.jpg
325 ms
vitascan-160x120.jpg
322 ms
usertech-160x120.jpg
321 ms
hr-tab.jpg
258 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
print.css
33 ms
emarked.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
emarked.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
emarked.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emarked.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emarked.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emarked.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emarked. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: