Tools & Wizards About Us
emas-clinic.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

emas-clinic.ru

Персональный сайт стоматолога-ортопеда Эмиля Асиряна

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

887 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

emas-clinic.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Emas Clinic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emas-clinic.ru

Visit emas-clinic.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Emas-clinic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 887 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emas-clinic.ru performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emas-clinic.ru

887 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

263 ms

styles.css

264 ms

frontend.css

265 ms

settings.css

394 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Emas-clinic.ru, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Emas-clinic.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (70%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

631.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emas-clinic.ru main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 51.4 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 57 B

  • Original 278.1 kB
  • After minification 278.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emas Clinic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 508.1 kB

  • Original 717.3 kB
  • After minification 690.4 kB
  • After compression 209.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 508.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 960.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 985.3 kB
  • After compression 131.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emas-clinic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 960.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (69%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emas Clinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emas-clinic.ru

emas-clinic.ru

887 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

263 ms

styles.css

styles.css

264 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

265 ms

settings.css

settings.css

394 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1493 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

619 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

521 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

665 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

395 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

524 ms

likely.css

likely.css

524 ms

theme-elements.css

theme-elements.css

1216 ms

style.css

style.css

917 ms

css

css

27 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

818 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

642 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

866 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

770 ms

css

css

20 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

771 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

816 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

817 ms

plugins-compressed.js

plugins-compressed.js

1394 ms

theme-functions.js

theme-functions.js

900 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

946 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

947 ms

Lustra.png

Lustra.png

183 ms

video2-preview.jpg

video2-preview.jpg

302 ms

video3-preview.jpg

video3-preview.jpg

296 ms

video1-preview.jpg

video1-preview.jpg

263 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

90 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

115 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

133 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

150 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

159 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

159 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

292 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

163 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

159 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

246 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

280 ms

ring.svg

ring.svg

279 ms

Accessibility Review

emas-clinic.ru accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

emas-clinic.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emas-clinic.ru SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emas-clinic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emas-clinic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emas-clinic.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emas Clinic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: