Tools & Wizards About Us
ematerials.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

ematerials.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

767 ms

Page Rendered

303 ms

ematerials.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ematerials.com now to see the best up-to-date Ematerials content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ematerials.com

Visit ematerials.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ematerials.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ematerials.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rlogin

285 ms

generic.js

41 ms

style.css

80 ms

ajaxObj.js

146 ms

banner_eMaterials.png

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ematerials.com, 29% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) belongs to the original domain Ematerials.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

70.8 kB

After Optimization

50.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ematerials.com main page is 70.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 30.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 783 B

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ematerials images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ematerials.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ematerials. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rlogin

rlogin

285 ms

generic.js

generic.js

41 ms

style.css

style.css

80 ms

ajaxObj.js

ajaxObj.js

146 ms

banner_eMaterials.png

banner_eMaterials.png

264 ms

ga.js

ga.js

82 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

ematerials.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ematerials.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ematerials.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ematerials.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ematerials.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ematerials.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ematerials. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: