2.9 sec in total
38 ms
1.6 sec
1.3 sec
Visit embrace.io now to see the best up-to-date Embrace content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about embrace.io
Modern mobile observability built on OpenTelemetry. Discover the only user-focused, mobile-first observability solution built on OTel.
Visit embrace.ioWe analyzed Embrace.io page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
embrace.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value2,450 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
38 ms
215 ms
13 ms
39 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Embrace.io, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Log.cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Embrace.io.
Page size can be reduced by 357.6 kB (36%)
998.5 kB
640.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Embrace.io main page is 998.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 467.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 357.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 357.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Embrace images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)
40
36
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Embrace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
embrace.io
38 ms
embrace.io
215 ms
cookieyes-lazyload.min.js
13 ms
script.js
39 ms
log
465 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
force-js-load.min.js
76 ms
lazyload.min.js
75 ms
logo-yellow.svg
113 ms
OTel_BlogImage.png
114 ms
logo-black.svg
216 ms
homepagedesktop-scaled.jpg
408 ms
Group-2239-1.png
359 ms
logo_paysend_steel1.svg
353 ms
logo1-white2.svg
260 ms
logo2-white2.svg
261 ms
logo3-white2.svg
517 ms
logo_warbyparker_steel1.svg
463 ms
logo4-white2.svg
499 ms
logo5-white2-2.svg
555 ms
wildlife-logo-steel.svg
436 ms
logo7-white2.svg
552 ms
logo8-white2.svg
573 ms
logo9-white2.svg
667 ms
logo10-white2.svg
632 ms
logo11-white2.svg
645 ms
logo12-white2.svg
680 ms
logo13-white2.svg
687 ms
zynga_wide_dog_steel.svg
691 ms
Screenshot-2024-06-03-at-10.23.02%E2%80%AFAM.png
854 ms
Walnut-demo_desktop-1.png
897 ms
testi-quote.svg
875 ms
black-quote.svg
804 ms
4.png
861 ms
wildlife-logo-black.svg
820 ms
wild-life_lead-on-transparent_1600x1600.png
1079 ms
gramgameslogo.png
825 ms
cameo.png
965 ms
goat.png
1120 ms
why-embrace-otel.png
1014 ms
iOS_built_on_OTel-1.png
1105 ms
embrace-grafana-1200x1030-1.png
1118 ms
icon-mouse-56x52.png
1110 ms
wARDj0u
4 ms
embrace.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
embrace.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
embrace.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Embrace.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Embrace.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
embrace.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Embrace. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: