2 sec in total
73 ms
1.5 sec
449 ms
Click here to check amazing Emergency Excellence content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emergencyexcellence.com
Improve Emergency Department - Patient Callbacks (Discharge Phone Calls / Patient Followup Services), Consulting, Benchmarking2
Visit emergencyexcellence.comWe analyzed Emergencyexcellence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
emergencyexcellence.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
73 ms
68 ms
76 ms
47 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Emergencyexcellence.com, 19% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to 415.464.myftpupload.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) relates to the external source 415.464.myftpupload.com.
Page size can be reduced by 101.2 kB (6%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Emergencyexcellence.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emergency Excellence images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emergencyexcellence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (69%)
59
18
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emergency Excellence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
emergencyexcellence.com
73 ms
emergencyexcellence.com
68 ms
js
76 ms
style.min.css
47 ms
styles.css
69 ms
rs6.css
132 ms
style.css
51 ms
screen.css
50 ms
reset.css
87 ms
wordpress.css
88 ms
animation.css
95 ms
magnific-popup.css
69 ms
custom.css
90 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
128 ms
flexslider.css
187 ms
tooltipster.css
102 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
140 ms
font-awesome.min.css
120 ms
custom-css.php
241 ms
style.css
161 ms
css
84 ms
css
114 ms
css
82 ms
grid.css
152 ms
css
83 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
155 ms
jquery.min.js
175 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
175 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
173 ms
rs6.min.js
198 ms
signup-form.css
76 ms
signup-form.js
83 ms
css
74 ms
index.js
196 ms
index.js
194 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
199 ms
jquery.stellar.js
190 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
206 ms
jquery.easing.js
217 ms
waypoints.min.js
213 ms
jquery.isotope.js
226 ms
jquery.masory.js
239 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
227 ms
custom_plugins.js
230 ms
custom.js
204 ms
custom_onepage.js
206 ms
reset.css
352 ms
wordpress.css
288 ms
original-440x150.png
206 ms
imageedit_6_3969708759.jpg
33 ms
callback2.jpg
31 ms
benchmarking.jpg
31 ms
ecoe-1.jpg
28 ms
consulting-1.jpg
59 ms
improve-satisfaction-1.png
32 ms
improve-quality-2.png
87 ms
improve-reputation-1.png
33 ms
improve-efficiency-1.png
33 ms
linkedin.png
86 ms
linkedin-hover-1.png
85 ms
cb2-v.jpg
216 ms
benchmarking-v.jpg
213 ms
ecoe2-v.jpg
214 ms
cb1-1-v.jpg
238 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
87 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aX8.ttf
97 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
95 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
95 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w0aX8.ttf
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
116 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
116 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
115 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtXA_A.ttf
133 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDTbtY.ttf
132 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDTbtY.ttf
133 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
160 ms
cb2-v.jpg
589 ms
benchmarking-v.jpg
591 ms
ecoe2-v.jpg
501 ms
cb1-1-v.jpg
590 ms
emergencyexcellence.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
emergencyexcellence.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
emergencyexcellence.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emergencyexcellence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emergencyexcellence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emergencyexcellence.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emergency Excellence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: