Tools & Wizards About Us
emilyandjo.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

emilyandjo.co.uk

Bespoke Wedding Invitations & Social Stationery by Emily & Jo

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

548 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

emilyandjo.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to emilyandjo.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Emily And Jo best content right away, or after learning these important things about emilyandjo.co.uk

At Emily&Jo we offer beautifully designed, beautifully executed couture wedding and social stationery, resulting in gorgeous, ageless wedding invitations.

Visit emilyandjo.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Emilyandjo.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 548 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emilyandjo.co.uk performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emilyandjo.co.uk

548 ms

slideshow.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

fadeslideshow.js

283 ms

swfobject.js

274 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Emilyandjo.co.uk, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Emilyandjo.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 191.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

816.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emilyandjo.co.uk main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 954.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 154.4 kB

  • Original 954.0 kB
  • After minification 799.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emily And Jo needs image optimization as it can save up to 154.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 23.6 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emilyandjo.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emily And Jo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emilyandjo.co.uk

emilyandjo.co.uk

548 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

fadeslideshow.js

fadeslideshow.js

283 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

274 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

274 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

271 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

9 ms

sealed_with_the_rock_my_wedding_kiss_of_approval.png

sealed_with_the_rock_my_wedding_kiss_of_approval.png

85 ms

000-sep-EnJSohoDecoCU%20SScopy.jpg

000-sep-EnJSohoDecoCU%20SScopy.jpg

640 ms

001-sep-Geni1%20copy.jpg

001-sep-Geni1%20copy.jpg

647 ms

002-sep-hp3.jpg

002-sep-hp3.jpg

251 ms

003-sep-IMG_3739%20copy.jpg

003-sep-IMG_3739%20copy.jpg

581 ms

004-sep-PW%20copy.jpg

004-sep-PW%20copy.jpg

257 ms

005-sep-RMW_EJ.jpg

005-sep-RMW_EJ.jpg

570 ms

logo.png

logo.png

423 ms

shop_online.png

shop_online.png

431 ms

bespoke.png

bespoke.png

605 ms

pixel_trans.gif

pixel_trans.gif

604 ms

go_small.png

go_small.png

751 ms

icon_twitter.png

icon_twitter.png

757 ms

icon_facebook.png

icon_facebook.png

781 ms

largehomeimage.png

largehomeimage.png

1267 ms

seasons_colours_home.png

seasons_colours_home.png

804 ms

soholove-productbar.jpg

soholove-productbar.jpg

910 ms

productbarretro.JPG

productbarretro.JPG

1011 ms

product%20bar%20chandelier.jpg

product%20bar%20chandelier.jpg

927 ms

lmd.png

lmd.png

1030 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

979 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

8 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1052 ms

Accessibility Review

emilyandjo.co.uk accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emilyandjo.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

emilyandjo.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emilyandjo.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emilyandjo.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

emilyandjo.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emily And Jo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: