Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

emmel-a.net

Emmel - Bienvenue sur le blog de Marie-Laure !

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

669 ms

emmel-a.net screenshot

About Website

Visit emmel-a.net now to see the best up-to-date Emmel A content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emmel-a.net

Bienvenue sur le blog de Marie-Laure !

Visit emmel-a.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Emmel-a.net page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emmel-a.net performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.533

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emmel-a.net

291 ms

www.emmel-a.net

631 ms

1457077871index.css

253 ms

1458119820index.css

324 ms

1457077871index.js

394 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Emmel-a.net, 35% (30 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Emmel-a.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 452.1 kB (55%)

Content Size

818.5 kB

After Optimization

366.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Emmel-a.net main page is 818.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 263.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 189.1 kB

  • Original 218.7 kB
  • After minification 213.3 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 222.5 kB
  • After minification 217.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emmel A images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 178.1 kB

  • Original 263.7 kB
  • After minification 254.0 kB
  • After compression 85.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 113.5 kB
  • After minification 109.7 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emmel-a.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (73%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emmel A. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

emmel-a.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

emmel-a.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emmel-a.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emmel-a.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emmel-a.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emmel A. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: