410 ms in total
83 ms
226 ms
101 ms
Visit emo.com now to see the best up-to-date Emo content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emo.com
Writer's Workbench - English Writing Software that analyzes writers' compositions through instructional computer feedback
Visit emo.comWe analyzed Emo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 327 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
emo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
83 ms
16 ms
10 ms
11 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Emo.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (83 ms) belongs to the original domain Emo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 50.0 kB (20%)
254.4 kB
204.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Emo.com main page is 254.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 232.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emo needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
58
58
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emo. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
emo.com
83 ms
style2.css
16 ms
Masthead.png
10 ms
pushbutthome.jpg
11 ms
button261.jpg
18 ms
button1FF.jpg
18 ms
button1ED.jpg
21 ms
button2C1.jpg
20 ms
button26C.jpg
21 ms
button266.jpg
19 ms
button258.jpg
24 ms
button386.jpg
27 ms
button300.jpg
28 ms
button446.jpg
32 ms
button49D.jpg
31 ms
button1FE.jpg
29 ms
button19C.jpg
33 ms
button44.jpg
35 ms
button54.jpg
36 ms
buttonAA.jpg
38 ms
buttonD3.jpg
39 ms
button527.jpg
44 ms
button1E8.jpg
47 ms
bbbAplus[1].gif
43 ms
MSGoldCertiPartner.gif
47 ms
button10A.jpg
10 ms
button10B.jpg
13 ms
button200.jpg
10 ms
button201.jpg
14 ms
button262.jpg
12 ms
button263.jpg
11 ms
button2C2.jpg
21 ms
button2C3.jpg
23 ms
button301.jpg
25 ms
button302.jpg
20 ms
button387.jpg
22 ms
button388.jpg
23 ms
button447.jpg
28 ms
button448.jpg
35 ms
button49E.jpg
34 ms
button49F.jpg
35 ms
buttonD4.jpg
30 ms
buttonD5.jpg
32 ms
button1EE.jpg
36 ms
button1EF.jpg
39 ms
button1FF1.jpg
42 ms
button202.jpg
44 ms
button19D.jpg
41 ms
button19E.jpg
44 ms
button259.jpg
45 ms
button25A.jpg
46 ms
button264.jpg
50 ms
button265.jpg
51 ms
button26D.jpg
53 ms
button26E.jpg
53 ms
button45.jpg
55 ms
button46.jpg
54 ms
button55.jpg
58 ms
button56.jpg
61 ms
buttonAB.jpg
60 ms
buttonAC.jpg
62 ms
emo.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
emo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
emo.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: