Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

emojipik.com

emojipik.com - emojipik Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

429 ms

emojipik.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to emojipik.com homepage info - get ready to check Emojipik best content right away, or after learning these important things about emojipik.com

emojipik.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, emojipik.com has it all. We hope you find w...

Visit emojipik.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emojipik.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emojipik.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

emojipik.com

117 ms

emojipik.com

461 ms

FnPxg2

958 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

166 ms

style.min.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Emojipik.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) relates to the external source Spacatty.fun.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 82.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

415.1 kB

After Optimization

332.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Emojipik.com main page is 415.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 137.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 56.2 kB

  • Original 76.3 kB
  • After minification 76.3 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 137.6 kB
  • After minification 111.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emojipik needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 269 B

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 74.5 kB
  • After compression 74.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 294 B

  • Original 126.7 kB
  • After minification 126.7 kB
  • After compression 126.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emojipik.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (79%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emojipik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

emojipik.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

emojipik.com best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

emojipik.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emojipik.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emojipik.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emojipik. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: