Tools & Wizards About Us
emosurf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

emosurf.com

EmoSurf.com

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

832 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

emosurf.com screenshot

About Website

Visit emosurf.com now to see the best up-to-date Emo Surf content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emosurf.com

Рекомендательно-развлекательный портал эмоционального контента

Visit emosurf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emosurf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 832 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emosurf.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.133

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value54.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emosurf.com

832 ms

style_v1684619015.css

197 ms

jquery.min_v1524355200.js

299 ms

std_v1524960000.js

315 ms

index_v1534982400.js

316 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Emosurf.com, 40% (4 requests) were made to Ads.themoneytizer.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) belongs to the original domain Emosurf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

43.3 kB

After Optimization

41.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emosurf.com main page is 43.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 37.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 568 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 507 B or 47% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 262 B

  • Original 37.4 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 619 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emosurf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 619 B or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emo Surf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emosurf.com

emosurf.com

832 ms

style_v1684619015.css

style_v1684619015.css

197 ms

jquery.min_v1524355200.js

jquery.min_v1524355200.js

299 ms

std_v1524960000.js

std_v1524960000.js

315 ms

index_v1534982400.js

index_v1534982400.js

316 ms

js

js

72 ms

gen.js

gen.js

42 ms

requestform.js

requestform.js

54 ms

gen.js

gen.js

62 ms

requestform.js

requestform.js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

emosurf.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

emosurf.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

emosurf.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emosurf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Emosurf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emosurf.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emo Surf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: