Tools & Wizards About Us
empaction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

empaction.com

empaction: Ihr professioneller E-Mail Marketing Anbieter - empaction GmbH

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

237 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

178 ms

empaction.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Empaction content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about empaction.com

Wir haben ein Newsletter Tool entwickelt, mit dem Sie Ihre Newsletter Kampagnen online über einen Internetbrowser erstellen, versenden und auswerten können.

Visit empaction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Empaction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

empaction.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

empaction.com

237 ms

971 ms

0ba909173ebc.js

232 ms

main.css

304 ms

articles.css

320 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Empaction.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Empaction.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Empaction.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 30.6 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 213.0 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Empaction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Empaction.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Empaction. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

empaction.com

empaction.com

237 ms

971 ms

0ba909173ebc.js

0ba909173ebc.js

232 ms

main.css

main.css

304 ms

articles.css

articles.css

320 ms

empaction-logo.png

empaction-logo.png

135 ms

main.css

main.css

123 ms

articles.css

articles.css

125 ms

verlauf.png

verlauf.png

114 ms

effizient.png

effizient.png

1131 ms

messbar.png

messbar.png

1447 ms

persoenlich.png

persoenlich.png

1230 ms

Banner_HP_TM.jpg

Banner_HP_TM.jpg

671 ms

Edeka.jpg

Edeka.jpg

449 ms

HSV.jpg

HSV.jpg

423 ms

Orsay.jpg

Orsay.jpg

573 ms

Schneider.jpg

Schneider.jpg

603 ms

Tegut.jpg

Tegut.jpg

736 ms

Triumph.jpg

Triumph.jpg

752 ms

Union_Investment.jpg

Union_Investment.jpg

791 ms

Visuelle_Gestaltung.png

Visuelle_Gestaltung.png

844 ms

Kampagnenmanagement.png

Kampagnenmanagement.png

862 ms

Beratung.png

Beratung.png

902 ms

Mobile_Optimierung.png

Mobile_Optimierung.png

958 ms

Blog.png

Blog.png

982 ms

Treffpunkt.png

Treffpunkt.png

1011 ms

Online_Demo.png

Online_Demo.png

1086 ms

United.png

United.png

1170 ms

eco.png

eco.png

1138 ms

Euro.png

Euro.png

1273 ms

CSA.png

CSA.png

1263 ms

comodo.png

comodo.png

1268 ms

TM.png

TM.png

1336 ms

Netzsieger_sw2.png

Netzsieger_sw2.png

1342 ms

LinkedIn.png

LinkedIn.png

1369 ms

Xing.png

Xing.png

1376 ms

DINWeb.woff

DINWeb.woff

1456 ms

2B94E1_0_0.woff

2B94E1_0_0.woff

1508 ms

bullet-point-yellow.png

bullet-point-yellow.png

1460 ms

2B94E1_1_0.woff

2B94E1_1_0.woff

1531 ms

DINWeb-Medium.woff

DINWeb-Medium.woff

1509 ms

Accessibility Review

empaction.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

empaction.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

empaction.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Empaction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Empaction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

empaction.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Empaction. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: