8.5 sec in total
515 ms
7.4 sec
588 ms
Visit emtac.in now to see the best up-to-date EMTAC content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emtac.in
ISO/IEC 17025 (NABL) accredited test facility for Electrical and Electronics Testing in Hyderabad, PSP Certification, RF Testing, CE Marking, EMI and EMC Testing
Visit emtac.inWe analyzed Emtac.in page load time and found that the first response time was 515 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
emtac.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
8/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value780 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.974
2/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
515 ms
1940 ms
450 ms
693 ms
697 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Emtac.in, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Emtac.in.
Page size can be reduced by 213.3 kB (9%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Emtac.in main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EMTAC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emtac.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (58%)
84
35
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EMTAC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
emtac.in
515 ms
emtac.in
1940 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
450 ms
style.min.css
693 ms
theme.min.css
697 ms
styles.css
725 ms
bootstrap.css
991 ms
font-awesome.css
755 ms
flaticon.css
763 ms
owl.css
934 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
930 ms
animate.css
969 ms
hover.css
1012 ms
style.css
1023 ms
custom.css
1165 ms
tut.css
1176 ms
gutenberg.css
1212 ms
responsive.css
1239 ms
css
36 ms
kingcomposer.min.css
1267 ms
animate.css
1281 ms
flaticon.css
1396 ms
icons.css
1418 ms
owl.carousel.css
1454 ms
js
73 ms
jquery.min.js
1735 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1522 ms
js
65 ms
js
113 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1656 ms
index.js
1427 ms
core.min.js
1454 ms
popper.min.js
1493 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1655 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1673 ms
wow.js
1698 ms
isotope.js
1757 ms
html5lightbox.js
1781 ms
gmaps.js
1826 ms
map-helper.js
1841 ms
script.js
1895 ms
kingcomposer.min.js
1940 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1740 ms
emtac-logo-h150.png
467 ms
emtac-logo-white-h150.png
516 ms
service-pattern.png
1039 ms
service-pattern.png
566 ms
testing-services.jpg
1091 ms
service-4.jpg
900 ms
NABL-Logo-405x300px.jpg
714 ms
BIS-Logo-405x300px.jpg
769 ms
TEC-Logo-405x300px.jpg
799 ms
NABCB-Logo-405x300px.jpg
962 ms
img-001-min.jpg
1271 ms
img-002-min.jpg
1033 ms
img-003-min.jpg
1143 ms
img-004-min.jpg
1211 ms
img-005-min.jpg
1267 ms
img-006-min.jpg
1294 ms
img-007-min.jpg
1332 ms
img-008-min.jpg
1386 ms
emtac-allservices.jpg
2194 ms
pattern.jpg
1500 ms
abt_img_emtac.jpg
1774 ms
img-01-90x90xc.png
1549 ms
img-02-90x90xc.png
1572 ms
img-03-90x90xc.png
1629 ms
img-04-90x90xc.png
1644 ms
img-05-90x90xc.png
1715 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
1709 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
58 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
59 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERKSiw.woff
58 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERKSiw.woff
57 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERKSiw.woff
59 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4Ag.woff
58 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERKSiw.woff
59 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
1759 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
1830 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
1836 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
1846 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
1796 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1865 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2105 ms
et-line.woff
1908 ms
img-06-90x90xc.png
1887 ms
footer-pattern.png
1855 ms
20191120_114631-scaled.jpg
1210 ms
2.png
324 ms
2-1.png
417 ms
homepage-2.jpg
662 ms
Flaticon.svg
435 ms
Flaticon.woff
526 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
539 ms
iframe_api
44 ms
fontello.css
636 ms
www-widgetapi.js
4 ms
emtac.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
emtac.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
emtac.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emtac.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emtac.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
emtac.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EMTAC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: