Tools & Wizards About Us
enconin.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

enconin.com

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

675 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

586 ms

enconin.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Enconin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enconin.com

Visit enconin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Enconin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 675 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enconin.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.211

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enconin.com

675 ms

enconin.com

1162 ms

animate.min.css

657 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1505 ms

fontawsome.min.css

1079 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Enconin.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Enconin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.6 MB (27%)

Content Size

13.1 MB

After Optimization

9.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enconin.com main page is 13.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 2.5 MB

  • Original 11.7 MB
  • After minification 9.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Enconin needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.5 MB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 704.9 kB

  • Original 908.5 kB
  • After minification 700.3 kB
  • After compression 203.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 704.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 370.6 kB

  • Original 438.4 kB
  • After minification 421.0 kB
  • After compression 67.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enconin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 370.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (34%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

56

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enconin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enconin.com

enconin.com

675 ms

enconin.com

enconin.com

1162 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

657 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1505 ms

fontawsome.min.css

fontawsome.min.css

1079 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

649 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

652 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

656 ms

nice-select.min.css

nice-select.min.css

868 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

871 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

875 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

878 ms

odometer.min.css

odometer.min.css

1087 ms

barfiller.css

barfiller.css

1090 ms

style.css

style.css

1535 ms

dark.css

dark.css

1099 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1295 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1305 ms

portfolio_category-1.png

portfolio_category-1.png

1742 ms

portfolio_category-10.png

portfolio_category-10.png

1537 ms

portfolio_category-12.jpg

portfolio_category-12.jpg

1513 ms

portfolio_category-14.png

portfolio_category-14.png

1955 ms

portfolio_category-16.jpg

portfolio_category-16.jpg

1724 ms

portfolio_category-17.jpg

portfolio_category-17.jpg

2162 ms

portfolio_category-19.jpg

portfolio_category-19.jpg

1756 ms

shape1.png

shape1.png

1553 ms

ww2.jpg

ww2.jpg

1737 ms

mail.png

mail.png

2638 ms

shape3.png

shape3.png

1764 ms

testimonial-2.png

testimonial-2.png

1773 ms

testimonial-3.png

testimonial-3.png

1955 ms

testimonial-4.png

testimonial-4.png

1962 ms

testimonial-8.png

testimonial-8.png

1984 ms

testimonial-11.png

testimonial-11.png

1993 ms

testimonial-12.png

testimonial-12.png

2168 ms

client-57.png

client-57.png

2177 ms

client-58.png

client-58.png

2181 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

2209 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2001 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2175 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

1970 ms

meanmenu.js

meanmenu.js

1961 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1783 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

1968 ms

TweenMax.js

TweenMax.js

2202 ms

nice-select.min.js

nice-select.min.js

1990 ms

form-validator.min.js

form-validator.min.js

1792 ms

contact-form-script.js

contact-form-script.js

1957 ms

ajaxchimp.min.js

ajaxchimp.min.js

1969 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

1974 ms

appear.min.js

appear.min.js

1795 ms

barfiller.js

barfiller.js

1787 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

1756 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1763 ms

css2

css2

1761 ms

css2-1

css2-1

1783 ms

client-60.png

client-60.png

1667 ms

client-61.png

client-61.png

1647 ms

client-62.png

client-62.png

1954 ms

client-63.png

client-63.png

2877 ms

client-64.png

client-64.png

1929 ms

client-65.png

client-65.png

2169 ms

client-66.png

client-66.png

1581 ms

client-67.png

client-67.png

1567 ms

client-68.png

client-68.png

1659 ms

client-70.png

client-70.png

1644 ms

client-71.png

client-71.png

1762 ms

client-72.png

client-72.png

1836 ms

client-73.png

client-73.png

1847 ms

client-74.png

client-74.png

1738 ms

client-75.png

client-75.png

1781 ms

client-76.png

client-76.png

2736 ms

client-77.png

client-77.png

1853 ms

client-78.png

client-78.png

1731 ms

client-79.png

client-79.png

1722 ms

client-80.png

client-80.png

1746 ms

client-82.png

client-82.png

1849 ms

client-83.png

client-83.png

1740 ms

client-84.png

client-84.png

1729 ms

client-85.png

client-85.png

1792 ms

client-86.png

client-86.png

1853 ms

client-87.png

client-87.png

1913 ms

client-88.png

client-88.png

1744 ms

client-89.png

client-89.png

1804 ms

client-90.png

client-90.png

1790 ms

client-91.png

client-91.png

1873 ms

client-92.png

client-92.png

1913 ms

encon_logo.png

encon_logo.png

1916 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

1902 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

2052 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

1902 ms

ww2.jpg

ww2.jpg

1858 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1839 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1964 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1897 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

247 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

227 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

238 ms

Accessibility Review

enconin.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

enconin.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

enconin.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enconin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enconin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enconin.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enconin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: